Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Make the tag wiki, synonyms and hierarchy revision history public

Post

Make the tag wiki, synonyms and hierarchy revision history public

+3
−0

GitHub issue: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1218


When looking at a tag's wiki page on Codidact as a normal user with only the two basic abilities, there is no extended information such as revision history, or links to such, available:

Screenshot of a tag's wiki page on Meta Codidact

This makes little sense to me. Let's add a bar of links below the two-row table, for revision histories for the usage wiki, detailed wiki, synonym relationships with the tag, and changes to the parent and children tags:

Suggested changes in visual form


Reading from a few other posts, I'm not sure if a revision history is actually kept for all these properties. If not, consider this post a feature request to implement that, too, as it's a prerequisite.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Ooops, I messed up the link names in the second screenshot (1 comment)
Ooops, I messed up the link names in the second screenshot

Ooops, I messed up the link names in the screenshot of the suggested changes. I hope it's obvious I'm not asking for that be mistake to be implemented. :P