Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can. When I sometimes talk to s...
#4: Post edited
by
MathPhysics
·
2020-10-02T14:00:18Z (about 4 years ago)
- Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can.
- When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the community team are unpaid volunteers", "they have not free time to handle any issue", "Codidact is an open source platform so that anyone can fix a problem", and so on.
- I agree that **no** one should expect a volunteer to do some work, but for an *aspiring* community there should be a difference between "voluntariness" and "responsibility". In such a community the community team, though they may be unpaid volunteers, try to run the community like that they are paid staff.
- The Codidact community team have accepted to be the staff and run the community. So, in my opinion, if Codidact is an aspiring platform, one may expect that they work as paid staff do.
- Am I right?
- ---
- ## Notice
The initial version of [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/a/278266/278304) is the **accepted** and **the best** answer. You can find the initial version [here](https://meta.codidact.com/a/278266/278304) (Please note the current version of this answer is not original and not valid).
- Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can.
- When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the community team are unpaid volunteers", "they have not free time to handle any issue", "Codidact is an open source platform so that anyone can fix a problem", and so on.
- I agree that **no** one should expect a volunteer to do some work, but for an *aspiring* community there should be a difference between "voluntariness" and "responsibility". In such a community the community team, though they may be unpaid volunteers, try to run the community like that they are paid staff.
- The Codidact community team have accepted to be the staff and run the community. So, in my opinion, if Codidact is an aspiring platform, one may expect that they work as paid staff do.
- Am I right?
- ---
- ## Notice
- The initial version of [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/a/278266/278304) is the **accepted** and **the best** answer. You can find the initial version [here](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278304/history) (Please note the current version of this answer is not original and not valid).
#3: Post edited
by
MathPhysics
·
2020-10-02T13:58:37Z (about 4 years ago)
- Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can.
- When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the community team are unpaid volunteers", "they have not free time to handle any issue", "Codidact is an open source platform so that anyone can fix a problem", and so on.
- I agree that **no** one should expect a volunteer to do some work, but for an *aspiring* community there should be a difference between "voluntariness" and "responsibility". In such a community the community team, though they may be unpaid volunteers, try to run the community like that they are paid staff.
- The Codidact community team have accepted to be the staff and run the community. So, in my opinion, if Codidact is an aspiring platform, one may expect that they work as paid staff do.
Am I right?
- Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can.
- When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the community team are unpaid volunteers", "they have not free time to handle any issue", "Codidact is an open source platform so that anyone can fix a problem", and so on.
- I agree that **no** one should expect a volunteer to do some work, but for an *aspiring* community there should be a difference between "voluntariness" and "responsibility". In such a community the community team, though they may be unpaid volunteers, try to run the community like that they are paid staff.
- The Codidact community team have accepted to be the staff and run the community. So, in my opinion, if Codidact is an aspiring platform, one may expect that they work as paid staff do.
- Am I right?
- ---
- ## Notice
- The initial version of [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/a/278266/278304) is the **accepted** and **the best** answer. You can find the initial version [here](https://meta.codidact.com/a/278266/278304) (Please note the current version of this answer is not original and not valid).
#2: Post edited
by
luap42
·
2020-09-28T15:57:13Z (about 4 years ago)
#1: Initial revision
by
MathPhysics
·
2020-09-28T13:37:33Z (about 4 years ago)
Voluntariness vs. Responsibility, which of them should be considered as a priority for the community team?
Before starting the concern, I want to appreciate and acknowledge the community team for their volunteer efforts to run Codidact and handle its issues as far as they can. When I sometimes talk to some people about the state of some unhandled issues, I am answered explicitly or implicitly that "the community team are unpaid volunteers", "they have not free time to handle any issue", "Codidact is an open source platform so that anyone can fix a problem", and so on. I agree that **no** one should expect a volunteer to do some work, but for an *aspiring* community there should be a difference between "voluntariness" and "responsibility". In such a community the community team, though they may be unpaid volunteers, try to run the community like that they are paid staff. The Codidact community team have accepted to be the staff and run the community. So, in my opinion, if Codidact is an aspiring platform, one may expect that they work as paid staff do. Am I right?