Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Broken link on abilities page.

+4
−0

On the abilities page, I noticed that there is one broken link that leads to a 404 error.

It's the edit tags ability. Here is the link markdown: https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/edit_tagd.

I tried removing the d at the end of the link, but it didn't work. All the other links work fine and lead to the right privileges.

Has this feature not been implemented yet? If so, I think it should lead to a page that says something like:

This feature has not been implemented yet. It is still a work in process.

Broken links are just confusing IMO.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comments

Should be tags, not tagd: https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/edit_tags. Thanks for the report. Monica Cellio‭ 5 months ago

Glad to be of assistance :) 10 Rep‭ 5 months ago

A code fix has been offered for this issue and is currently pending review sau226‭ 5 months ago

1 answer

+3
−0

Thank you for raising this issue to our attention.

This has been fixed in the code for new sites (those sites that may be created after this post was made).

For all sites existing before the code fix (i.e. sites that exist as of this post), a manual override to the content by the sysadmin team is required. This question therefore may be tagged status-planned until this override is complete.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

Sign up to answer this question »