Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

75%
+7 −1
Q&A Actively investing in non niche network websites

(Please note that at the time this answer was posted, revision 4 of the question was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the we...

posted 3y ago by Canina‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Canina‭

Answer
#4: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-12T15:58:30Z (about 3 years ago)
  • <small>Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.</small>
  • ---
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
  • (Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.)
  • ---
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#3: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-12T15:57:34Z (about 3 years ago)
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
  • <small>Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.</small>
  • ---
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-12T08:15:03Z (about 3 years ago)
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, you should focus your effort on those proposals rather than making people reiterating what's already been discussed there, in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
  • At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
  • * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
  • * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
  • * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
  • * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
  • * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
  • If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-12T07:47:56Z (about 3 years ago)
At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.

 * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
 * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
 * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
 * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
 * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)

If you want to see such sites on Codidact, you should focus your effort on those proposals rather than making people reiterating what's already been discussed there, in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.