Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
(Please note that at the time this answer was posted, revision 4 of the question was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the we...
Answer
#4: Post edited
<small>Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.</small>- ---
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
- If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
- (Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.)
- ---
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
- If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#3: Post edited
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
- If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
- <small>Please note that at the time this answer was posted, [revision 4 of the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284843/history) was current. That revision of the question, as the initial revision, had as its first paragraph "I think that the website must have about 5 more new communities in "piquant" topics to become more well-known and contributed." followed by a list of the below five subject areas.</small>
- ---
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
- If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#2: Post edited
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
If you want to see such sites on Codidact, you should focus your effort on those proposals rather than making people reiterating what's already been discussed there, in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
- At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals.
- * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this)
- * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103)
- * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084)
- * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809)
- * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062)
- If you want to see such sites on Codidact, then **you should focus your effort on those proposals** rather than make people reiterate what has already been discussed there, only in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.
#1: Initial revision
At least four out of your five suggested sites (by name) already have proposals. * Cosmetics (I'm not aware of a proposal for anything like this) * Chemistry [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280103) * Biology [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280084) * Finance [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279809) * Accounting [proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279062) If you want to see such sites on Codidact, you should focus your effort on those proposals rather than making people reiterating what's already been discussed there, in a far less discoverable and far more entangled form.