Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

50%
+2 −2
Q&A Permanently delete duplicated questions and answers?

I'm pretty sure you can't. Of course, it would be technically possible for someone with database access to go in and permanently delete a post. But no such feature is exposed in the UI, up to and ...

posted 3y ago by Canina‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Canina‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-25T18:03:19Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • I'm pretty sure you can't.
  • Of course, it would be *technically possible* for someone with database access to go in and permanently delete a post. But no such feature is exposed in the UI, up to and including users with moderator access. (It's possible that it would be accessible to an administrator, but I don't think so.)
  • More broadly, such a feature would go contrary to the fact that the [CC BY-SA 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode) is *irrevocable*. (My emphasis below.)
  • > Section 2 - Scope.
  • >
  • > a\. License grant.
  • > 1\. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, **irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material** to:
  • > A\. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part; and
  • > B\. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material.
  • (When you post to Codidact under that license, "You" includes Codidact as the initial licensee.)
  • Deleted posts are also only visible to a subset of users ([bugs notwithstanding](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284937)), so this isn't a big problem in practice.
  • I have seen some cases where the owner of a post has edited it to delete the actual content, when duplicates were posted, and simply indicate something like "this was a duplicate of &lt;some other post by link&gt;". For situations where the content is truly a duplicate, and especially where the post is long, this may be acceptable; but note that it still does nothing to change the licensing status of the originally posted content.
  • I'm pretty sure you can't.
  • Of course, it would be *technically possible* for someone with database access to go in and permanently delete a post. But no such feature is exposed in the UI, up to and including users with [administrator](https://meta.codidact.com/comments/thread/5032) access.
  • Deleted posts are also only visible to a subset of users ([bugs notwithstanding](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284937)), so this isn't a big problem in practice.
  • I have seen some cases where the owner of a post has edited it to delete the actual content, when duplicates were posted, and simply indicate something like "this was a duplicate of &lt;some other post by link&gt;". For situations where the content is truly a duplicate, and especially where the post is long, this is probably the best (or least bad) option; but do note that it still does nothing to change the licensing status of the originally posted content.
  • Another at least potential issue is that such a permanent deletion feature would go contrary to the fact that the [CC BY-SA 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode) is *irrevocable*. (My emphasis below.) At the very least, such deletion would make it more difficult to show that some content *was* provided under some specific license, as also to some extent discussed [elsewhere](https://meta.codidact.com/comments/thread/1523#comment-5002).
  • > Section 2 - Scope.
  • >
  • > a\. License grant.
  • > 1\. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, **irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material** to:
  • > A\. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part; and
  • > B\. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material.
  • (When you post to Codidact under that license, "You" includes Codidact as the initial licensee.)
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Canina‭ · 2021-11-25T09:10:51Z (almost 3 years ago)
I'm pretty sure you can't.

Of course, it would be *technically possible* for someone with database access to go in and permanently delete a post. But no such feature is exposed in the UI, up to and including users with moderator access. (It's possible that it would be accessible to an administrator, but I don't think so.)

More broadly, such a feature would go contrary to the fact that the [CC BY-SA 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode) is *irrevocable*. (My emphasis below.)

> Section 2 - Scope.
>
> a\. License grant.  
> 1\. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, **irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material** to:  
> A\. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part; and  
> B\. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material.

(When you post to Codidact under that license, "You" includes Codidact as the initial licensee.)

Deleted posts are also only visible to a subset of users ([bugs notwithstanding](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284937)), so this isn't a big problem in practice.

I have seen some cases where the owner of a post has edited it to delete the actual content, when duplicates were posted, and simply indicate something like "this was a duplicate of &lt;some other post by link&gt;". For situations where the content is truly a duplicate, and especially where the post is long, this may be acceptable; but note that it still does nothing to change the licensing status of the originally posted content.