Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Diagram errors in "Scoring" help article

+1
−0

The help page explaining the post scoring method has some diagrams at the end, but they are somewhat confusing.

Axis mislabelling

The following chart has a horizontal axis labelled "N", which is confusing as there is no other mention of "N" on the page. Should this say "z"?

Chart with horizontal axis labelled "N"

Diagrams in a different order to the descriptions

The description below each diagram is confusing:

  1. The first diagram does not have a description, making it unclear whether the description below the second diagram refers to only the second or to both.
  2. The second diagram has a description that looks like it is probably correct, but is confusing due to mentioning "z", where the diagram (probably incorrectly) shows "N".
  3. The third diagram has a description saying "This table" when it is a 3 dimensional plot of a surface. It looks like this description might belong with the first image.

Since the third image appears to be a 3 dimensional visualisation of the data in the table in the first image (over a slightly larger domain: 1-15 votes rather than 1-10), it might be easier to understand if those two images were adjacent, rather than being separated by the less related second image that varies z.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »