Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Confusing percentage on Edit Posts Ability page

+2
−0

Related:


The Activity tab of my user profile, filtered to Edits shows 20 helpful suggested edits, and 1 declined.

The Edit Posts Ability page shows that I need a minimum of 30 approved suggested edits:

The Edit Posts Ability page, showing a progress bar at 33%

Since I have 20 out of 30, this suggests I would be at about 66% of the way to getting the Edit Posts ability. However, the page shows a progress bar at 33%.

The text above the bar says "Edit score threshold" which suggests this percentage may be based on the Wilson score used behind the scenes, rather than the number of approved suggested edits. Is this the case or is the 33% just a bug?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

The ability is based on the Wilson score of all your edit suggestions, yes, so that one declined one counts against you. There's been lots of discussion about (a) whether the thresholds are too high and (b) whether we should revamp the abilities system to use other metrics (in addition or instead). I'm reporting the current behavior, not saying I'm thrilled with how it's working.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »