Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

I can mark my own answer as "Works for me"

+4
−0

The "Works for me" reaction can be added to any answer, even if the reacting user is the author of the answer.

For example, here is what an answer looks like if I post the answer and react to it myself:

An answer with a "Works for me" reaction from the same user

Is this intended behaviour? What are the reasons for and against allowing this?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+3
−0

Intended. Or, more specifically, a special case that we didn't intercept.

Reactions are not "baked in"; they're defined by each community. We seed some default ones, but a community can remove them, add others, ore even edit them. Sometimes it makes sense for you to be able to react to your own post; for example, you might not have time to update an answer right now but you want to mark it as outdated in the meantime. We didn't give "works for me" any special status.

If we wanted to prevent (some) self-reactions, I think the correct way to do it would be to add a checkbox when creating/editing a reaction to indicate whether self-reactions are permitted for that reaction. That's possible but adds a little more complexity. Is it worth it? Reactions are signed (by design), so self-reactions are obvious. If a community considers them poor form, the community can probably discourage them in the same ways it encourages or discourages other behaviors.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Community policies (1 comment)

Sign up to answer this question »