Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Library of Congress classification: class AND subject tags (including sub-tags)

+1
−2

The library of Congress classification system gives items both a single class, and multiple subject tags. This system has some significant benefits.

Also, their subject tag system has sub-tags - for example, “Kant — Biography”, or “Technology — China”.

(Note: one easy way to enable giving each post a “class” is to select a “distinguished tag” for any post - there can only be one.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comment threads

"This system has some significant benefits." Can you explain which benefits it would have for codidac... (1 comment)
Codidact already has a tag hierarchy with parent tags and child tags. For example the `macOS` tag on ... (1 comment)
What do you mean? (1 comment)

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »