Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Would there ever be A / B testing?

+3
−1

Would there ever be a scenario where an experimental feature is tried out with a smaller cohort of users in order to observe the resulting dynamics and compare it to the alternative?

I mean more than just a feature testing playground (https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288826/288833).

I mean, in case people want to see what the site would be like with some change in design, that they have the option to sort of “fork” or branch off to see it, so that we don’t always have to agree as a majority what features the site can and cannot try out, sort of.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

+6
−0

Not in the forseeable future. Building a system to A-B test new features takes time, as does the analysis afterwards. While we're still a small team, it's more effective for us to collect feedback via Meta, make changes, and continue to collect feedback afterwards. This lets us make changes quickly without needing to go through a major process, while still being able to refine what we've done later if necessary.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+2
−0

ArtOfCode's answer covers true A/B testing, which involves a randomised experiment and the system to support it.

However, the question sounds as if it is also considering the ability for individual users to choose how to see the site:

... in case people want to see what the site would be like with some change in design ...

This could potentially take much less developer support than full A/B testing, as there is no random selection of which users to show the new design, especially if there is no record kept of how users interacted with it.

If the change being considered is solely a front end change (no change to the code running on the server, just changing what the browser displays to the user) then users are free to experiment with userscripts, which require no developer support.

For example, there is not yet developer support for implementing and maintaining a dark mode, but a couple of people (one of them me) have posted scripts that users can use to modify the colour scheme in the meantime.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »