Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
The current Terms of Service contain (emphasis mine): post content that is hateful, discriminatory, harmful, illegal, or otherwise objectionable; I find this part, pun intended, objectionable...
#1: Initial revision
by
mirabilos
·
2024-05-07T19:03:34Z (7 months ago)
Terms of Service: “otherwise objectionable” problematic
The current Terms of Service contain (emphasis mine): > post content that is hateful, discriminatory, harmful, illegal, or **otherwise objectionable**; I find this part, pun intended, objectionable: for example, should I post “I like `vi`” (which is not actually true but a well-known example), an Emacs user could find that objectionable, and thus it would be a ToS violation. Having read the CoC as well, I tend to think it sufficient to cover what this part of the ToS is meant to and this part of the ToS should be removed.