Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Details tag lacks sufficient styling and summary text

+1
−2

Expandable and collapsible text sections, created using the details HTML tag, are insufficiently stylized. This causes the browser to apply its own rules, for instance showing the default text "detaljer" in my browsers, as I run them in Norwegian.

Screenshot of the bottom part of this question:

Screenshot showcasing the issue

It's rendered pretty much identically in Safari and Firefox.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

By design? (3 comments)

2 answers

+4
−0

The text is not determined by styling, but by a summary tag that is supposed to be inside the details tag, and that is missing in the quoted question.

Example
<details>
<summary>Example</summary>

Content here

</details>

Note that while formally the summary tag is optional in the HTML specification, it also explicitly specifies that a browser-specific legend is displayed if no summary is given. Which in turn means that if you want any control on what is shown as legend, the summary tag essentially is mandatory.

I don't think you can set through styling the default text shown when the summary tag is missing.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

The technical answer turns the bug report into a feature request (1 comment)
+1
−0

I opened the web inspector and made a quick sketch of how I think these sections can be improved. The changes include removing the border, setting a background colour, lowering the weight of the summary font, changing thickness and colour of the dropdown arrow, and setting a border radius. The specific post that's used as an example, fails to include the "Crude example:" in a summary tag inside the details tag, so I moved it down there, too. In case a post doesn't actually specify this, Codidact should automatically insert <summary>Expand content</summary>, or some other appropriate text. Letting the browser automatically set the summary text in the user's own language, is unfavourable.

Without nitpicking on the exact details of how to style these, this is what I came up with:

Screenshot of the example sketched when the section is collapsed

Screenshot of the example sketched when the section is expanded

Currently, the expansion and collapsing actions are an instant snap. It should be updated to smoothy animate the increasing and decreasing height as the section is expanded and collapsed.

The changes include:

  • <summary style="font-weight: 5;padding-left: 35px;">Crude example:</summary>
  • 2px solid rgb(60, 70, 75) for border-top and border-right on details summary::before.
  • background-color: rgb(240, 245, 250); and border-radius: 6px; on details

I'd stress that I think this should first and foremost apply to posts, which is what the top-level post is about. It may apply to other elements on Codidact, however, the more basic and barebones version is in place on tag wikis (here, for example), and that looks fine as is.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »