Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Voting on a closed question

+6
−0

Currently, when a question is closed, it is still possible to add an upvote or downvote.

One possible reason for closing a question is to allow editing to improve, before re-opening. Would it be beneficial to prevent downvotes during this process, until the question is ready to open again?

More generally, should each of the following be possible on a question that is closed:

  • Upvoting?
  • Downvoting?
  • Retracting an upvote?
  • Retracting a downvote?
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+4
−0

Whatever we do, I think the following points should be true in any case:

  • Whenever you can give votes, you should be able to retract those votes. Be it because you didn't actually mean to vote (and that's not a theoretical issue; this has actually happened to me, though not yet on Codidact), or be it because the post was changed and you think the new state of the post no longer deserves that vote. The latter reason also means that you should not lose the ability to retract votes as long as the post can be edited. Since closing doesn't prevent edits, it also should not prevent retractions.

  • Either you can both upvote and downvote, or neither. I think allowing only one direction gives an undue bias.

So while this post does not conclusively answer the question, it reduces the complexity of the four detailed questions to the simple question: Should voting on closed questions be allowed or not?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+3
−0

Yes, these options should continue to be active.

A bad question is a bad question, and it is legitimate to downvote it because of that. The fact that it might be fixed later has no bearing on it being bad now. Perhaps there should be a way to notify downvoters when a question is re-opened so that they can decide whether to retract the downvote, but that's not what you asked about.

Another reason to accumulate downvotes on bad questions is to keep the total vote tally for the user accurate. Really bad questions don't tend to be from well-meaning users who happened to make a mistake. Most are from spammers and the like. Having their vote tally be negative will be important if/when we ever implement rate limiting or temporary banning based on accumulated vote score ("rep", if you like).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »