Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for . .
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278007 |
I don't know. I can't tell why you see misery where I see prosperity, and you see prosperity where I see misery. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281189 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
responsiveness Load codidact: Codidact is loaded Open menu: Codidact menu is clicked Grow window, menu opener disappears, but menu persists: (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279648 |
Please link the actual question once it's posted, thank you. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279292 |
Excellent. Less edits. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278908 |
software recommendations sounds like good idea for a category in software use? :D (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278944 |
I'll take that as a yes! (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278945 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Questionable button label when editing comment. Posting new comment is by selecting the function, writing the comment, hitting 'Post'. Editing existing comment is by selecting the function, making the amends, then hitting 'Post'. Having the same label in both those buttons prompts an awkard 'did I hit the correct function?' moment. This is u... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278944 |
Let's lobby against unnecessary editing until the edit history is optimized. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278943 |
@Moshi @53196 Nah, I was wrong and you are right. I just thought https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/commit/e4ac29bf4df9554956910611df9dc5c0416ec7ae was going to disrupt posts except where newly posted or edit. But this is looking odd, IDK if what's happening is that the changes it introduces are shad... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278944 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we display the number of views? soft no1 Codidact is already wasting a lot of storage space in the edits history2 and who knows what else, let's please not request unnecessary space waster features until the not-for-profit is already set up and the cash flow is demonstrated sustainable. 1: Temporary. 2: By storing (for eac... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278943 |
Don't worry, it'll go away once all of markdown is reprocessed. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278096 |
Why that pic is in ".stack."? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278894 |
do you realize the site is run by someone not named Art and not made of Code rite (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277504 |
https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/commit/a31157573e28061d39f6dea1e993adeaf7a8736c#commitcomment-43743889 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278894 | Post edited | — | about 4 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #278894 |
Suggested edit: (more) |
helpful | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278004 |
I can't see it no more! :) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278803 |
It works! (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278801 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
A clickable X that doesn't work When accessing Meta - http://meta.codidact.com - not signed in, there's a message. It reads: > Welcome to Codidact Meta! > > Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support quest... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278004 |
We might be closing in at last, see latest comments at https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/212 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277504 |
expect this problem to go away somewhat soon :) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278778 |
merged (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278757 |
merged (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278778 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Cancelling a comment. Now there is a comment cancellation pull request. The software is, for part of the stuff you could want, very easy to handle. I would totally recommend everyone suggesting their own changes. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278757 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Character tracker doesn't react on insertion via ContextMenu A working fix in tracks, here. The code proposed is maybe hacky or outdated, but works [for me]. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277566 |
I think I read someone else posting this elsewhere, a community meta most probably (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278665 |
Badges are needless gamification! Torch the badges! (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278538 |
"This proposed change has been made and is live." nope, merged 10/12, pending deployment; live is rev 4a161f6b dated from 10/04 (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278457 |
This implies CCBYSA content cannot be relicensed to CC0, but it fails to link some explanation to such claim. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278452 |
Post edited: tagggs |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278452 |
(lobbying for https://meta.codidact.com/questions/277479) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278452 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Allow licence change when there's only one contributor I wrote a post without realizing I was using the default licence CC BY-SA instead of the licence I wanted to use (CC0). I wanted to amend my mistake; I wasn't able to. Other similar (but closed source) Q&A platforms allow for flash edit. I need licence flash edits! (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278451 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: General discussion on making votes public Countering some Moshi's claims. > False accusations of revenge voting. (whether knowingly or not) That is, stuff like "I know @downvoter doesn't like me, that must be why they downvoted." and "I downvoted @downvoter's post a few days ago, they must be downvoting me because of that" When downvot... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278438 |
we should use #codidact@freenode for being less spied (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278441 |
Thanks for taking the time to post unpopular answer (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278438 |
Post edited: add chat transcript requested by an user |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278438 |
Post edited: stack the privacy word to the title for a more neutral title |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278439 |
Post edited: answer comment |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278439 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we have a community for Reviewing Code? > Should Codidact have a Community for reviewing code? Of course it should! But... should it do that now? No, because Software itself is very low traffic. ### your comments > Software development competes with the mothership. I think Codidact will get more traffic competing with the s... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278438 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
General discussion on making votes public Make vote secrecy a per-community choice, because some communities might prefer voting transparency over voting privacy. Side-question. Why voting is secret in other Q&A platforms? Origins in the Community Server (direct link to conversation), raw transcript follows (but expect format incon... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |