Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for msh210
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suggested Edit | Post #277245 |
Suggested edit: answerer asked for edits......... (more) |
helpful | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277188 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should the post title come before the body? I think the title text area should be after the body text area for the reasons outlined in 1 and 2. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277180 |
This seems to be a duplicate of https://meta.codidact.com/q/277015 (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277177 |
Maximum comment size is 500 (and yes I've gotten there a coupla times) so the amount one needs to scroll is minimal. While this feature would be nice, I personally would not push for its being prioritized. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277007 |
(Unrelated to the above comments, this is a comment directly on the answer.) I would participate casually, both asking and answering (my degree is in math) but not often. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276997 |
I would participate casually, asking the occasional question but almost certainly unable to contribute useful answers. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276942 |
… except that that 🗙 looks _terrible_ in whatever font my Chrome is using on this Android phone. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276942 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Clicking outside of notification popup does not close it Many many things online don't close when you click outside them. But then the UI usually shows how to close it (usually with an 🗙). I think the top of the list should have an 🗙 on the right side (near "Notifications") that closes the dropdown. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276865 |
I think language.codidact.com may be better: it refers to language itself (what linguistics studies) and sort-of to languages. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75033 |
"Theres no serious competitor (imo) to the other site": Maybe not generally, but maybe for specific languages? I know Perl Monks, though of course it has much less traffic than SO, has a Q&A section that gets people good answers — I suspect at a much better success rate than SO. I'd not be surprised ... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276781 |
Right, @MonicaCellio. That's why, even though it's an issue and worth mentioning, my answer here is this one. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276781 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Languages 'supersite' I think such a site can be viable, can include with its scope all sorts of questions about specific languages or about linguistics (with specific details about scope TBD). I think all the Q&A can be in one category, with tags for specific languages, for language families, for subfamilies, and for are... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276704 |
@MonicaCellio there are 142 language families, according to https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/largest-families (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276778 |
Re your proposed siteside categories "at a minimum two categories, one for language and one for linguistics": Can you explain the difference? Where would a question go that requires advanced linguistics study to even understand but is about only Dutch? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276778 |
Re your category list: There's phonology, e.g., which you omit. And then you have morphology and sign languages as separate categories, even though there's morphology _of_ SLs. Some of your categories are by subject, some are by style of question. And frankly some are insulting ("science of language"... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276738 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276738 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
login should be redirect to the page one was on On Stack Overflow and its sister sites as well as on Wikipedia and its sister sites, if you're on page X and click "Log In", you get to the login page (true here too). If you then log in, you get taken back to page X (not true here). That would be a nice feature here. Nothing terribly urgent (a doubl... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276703 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276703 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How should we approach a programming site or sites? This is less than a proposal: merely an idea. That's because I've not used SO much and don't know what works and what doesn't. So the following all has a big "maybe" attached to it. The programming/development site should use tags for language-agnostic things (sort, input, etc.) and categories for... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276665 |
Zerotime: For your future proposals, could you put one in each answer post please so that people may vote them up or down sensibly? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276663 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel I propose that we need a clause governing the criteria and process for removing a panel member in the very rare case that that should come up. (But I don't know what such criteria or process should be.) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276645 |
For comparison, [in U.S. courts, even summary judgments are reported](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/052819zor.html). (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276645 |
. . . I've edited this answer to state that clearly. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276645 |
Post edited: a bit more |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276645 |
@IsaacMoses, good point. But I don't like that a summary rejection can have been noticed by only two panel members, has no appeal, and has no publication. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276645 |
Yes, of course, @Mithrandir24601. I meant with details redacted as needed. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276644 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276640 |
I'd say "wait and see". We're not the _Académie française_ or the _Real Academia Española_, that we should decide what people should use. See what they __do__ use. It's early days yet. Or start using whatever you like and see if it catches on. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276645 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel Article 22 says that all decisions are to be published, exclusive of summary judgments. I think it should specify that the decisions be published with reasons included, and inclusive of summary judgments (though those may not have reasons stated). The more transparency into the workings of the panel,... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276644 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276644 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel Article 17.1 disallows successive warnings within two years. I don't think that's best. The second malfeasance may be of a different type from the first or a lesser degree than the first, in either of which cases a warning may be warranted. While a second warning within two years may be inappropriate... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276538 |
As a workaround, turn your phone sidewise and see if that helps. (It does for me.) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276530 |
Deferring it seems eminently reasonable. Thanks for looking into it! (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276519 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What help pages need to be written? A page on how pinging in comments works would be helpful. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276441 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
automatic linking to a specific category, by title I'd love a Codidact-specific markdown extension that links to a post in a particular category. That was really unclear, so let me give an example. A particular site can have a Glossary category with particular pages as entries in the category. Then `[[foo]]` anywhere on the site will link to the "foo... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276280 |
\0. Scope (generally). (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →