Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Allow including larger images

Post

Allow including larger images

+3
−4

Many images and screenshots captured today, are larger than 2 MB, the max allowed size on Codidact. This means users will regularly run into a barrier when attempting to upload images to their posts (or profile). Just now, I wanted to create a new post, which would benefit from some screenshots, however, that process was more complicated than it should have to be, because I was denied uploading the screenshots, as they were too large. I can still upload them, but I'll have to go compress them first. Codidact should accept images with a larger file size more reasonable today.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

4 comment threads

Also a UX and accessibility issue (1 comment)
Realism about compression (3 comments)
Server Side is MUCH Better (7 comments)
Implementation (1 comment)
Also a UX and accessibility issue
Canina‭ wrote 3 months ago

2 MB is, as already pointed out, already quite large. And remember: that's just one image. A page can display several, so for a screenshot-heavy post (not even a whole page with a question and multiple answers) the page-specific content can still easily approach, say, 10 MB if screenshots are around that size.

In https://meta.codidact.com/comments/thread/10095 you mention that you have a 4K screen and that your "screenshots often end up around 20 MB". I find that dubious, as for example 3840x2160 at 24bpp is about 23.7 MiB of image data. This would imply that your screenshots are often essentially imcompressible and that every pixel is equally important to convey your point.

Also, even the current limit can be a UX and to some extent accessibility issue. If I'm on mobile, 2 MB takes somewhere close to 20 seconds to download. Your "at least" level of 10 MB would take a minute and a half. Multiply that by several images on a page.

Not everyone is on a gigabit-level fiber connection.