I notice that there are several downvotes on this question, and that it may not be clear why.

Hopefully the upvotes on Monica's answer make it clear that the community is in favour of making Codidact accessible, and continuing to improve this over time. The downvotes are therefore unlikely to be objecting to accessibility. I suspect the downvotes are due to the way it has been asked.

It could be made clearer by providing context for the 2 quotations. I can guess that it is the second quotation that is from the Equality Act 2010, but labelling each block would remove the need for guesswork.

The question could also be more specific, but I understand that it may be deliberately vague - Monica's answer explains how to contact Codidact confidentially for anything you do not wish to discuss here in public. In particular, it is not clear whether you are seeking a more accessible website, or adjustments to help with contributing to Codidact's software or documentation.

Whichever type of improvement you are seeking, I hope the downvotes don't put you off from providing more details (whether publicly or privately). Even if the change can't be made immediately with Codidact's limited resources, longer term it is likely to help many people.