Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Should [status-completed] be used before the changes are live?

Parent

Should [status-completed] be used before the changes are live?

+7
−0

As of the time of writing, this request has the [status-completed] tag despite the change not being live yet. It is completely developed, sure, but since it is not yet deployed, should the request be marked completed?

discussion policies
posted about 4 years ago
4y ago
user card
Moshi‭
101 48 682 242
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+7
−1

A tag on the community meta should reflect the status as experienced by the community. A change in tag should communicate a change in experience. This allows users to provide feedback (it's working, it's not) rather than being unsure whether or not the new functionality is live because it might still be living in deployment limbo.

Comparing timestamps on deployment and update is non-intuitive. We should follow the principle of least astonishment and let status-complete mean complete from the view of the end user.

posted about 4 years ago
4y ago
user card
Sigma‭ staff
3 14 58 15
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (9 comments)
General comments
pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago
copy link

"Meta's tags are mainly used as a way for the site builders and administrators to keep track of what is completed or not" your words. A PR seems "job done" as far as a site builder is concerned.

elgonzo‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@pnuts, yes, Sigma's words. Sigma even says explicitly here in the answer: "...and let status-complete mean complete from the view of the end user". What Sigma wrote here is not in contradiction to what has been written in the answer you linked to. "keep track of what is completed or not" does not necessarily imply a different meaning of "completeness" than what Sigma wrote here.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

I can live with a little delay in the interest of making things easier for the developers, -1. While not perfect, Status-Completed when the code has been changed is good enough for me. Otherwise, the developers have to remember to come back to find outstanding "Code-updated" (or whatever) and change them to "Status-Implemented". I would rather keep it simple for the volunteers doing the work.

pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@elgonzo I suspect anything other than a space immediately after 'username' (immediately following@) does not ping. (And two or more word usernames might need to have the spaces removed.)

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@Olin Lathrop are you fine with "a little delay" of a couple days?

pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago
copy link

@Moshi For something as minor as 'Staff' flags in the User List I'd be fine with quite a lot longer, while things are as busy as they are at present. BTW My apologies for the bother I caused you over a now deleted Q.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@pnuts I was less worried about how minor it was than about how confusing it was. When I saw that it was marked "completed", I was actually going to post a bug report since the change didn't show up for me (but thankfully when I was linking the post in the report I saw the clarification that it wasn't live yet)

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago
copy link

are you fine with "a little delay" of a couple days? Certainly. Even longer is fine usually, once we know the feature has been added or bug fixed, and it's just a matter of getting thru the pipeline. This is especially true for trivial features like the one you linked to in your question.

elgonzo‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@pnuts oh, i wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the advice, appreciated!