Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Allow users to link more than one website in their profile.

Post

Allow users to link more than one website in their profile. [duplicate]

+4
−6

Closed as duplicate by Canina‭ on Sep 17, 2020 at 08:30

This question has been addressed elsewhere. See: More social media/online communities to link to profile.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Currently, users can only add their twitter handle and one other website to their profile. I find this kind of limiting since someone might want to add more to their profile. Say for instance they want to put a link to both their blog and their professional website; right now, they have no way of doing so (outside of putting it in the info box).

Could we have the option to link more than one website in our profile?

EDIT:

In response to "there is no problem to solve here."

Does a feature request have to solve a problem? Can't a requested feature be, you know, just to make things better/simpler/more convenient?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (10 comments)
General comments
Dani‭ wrote about 4 years ago

You can always 1.Put it in the profile description, 2.Use linktree for all links, and put that in the other website spot.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Dani 1. I did explicitly say that it was an option. 2. I had no idea about linktree, and I doubt many people do either. Besides, using linktree just sems like a workaround, being able to do it here would be preferrable.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Down voters please explain?

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Votes here on meta mean agreement/disagreement. The obvious interpretation of the downvotes is therefore "I don't think this is a worthwhile feature".

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Olin Lathrop Might be obvious to you, but to me disagreement means "This feature shouldn't be implemented"

Canina‭ wrote about 4 years ago

FWIW, with regards to the side question on what feature request means, I agree that a feature request can be for something that simply makes the site better, without necessarily solving an existing problem. I also think it's reasonable for a downvote on a feature request to express "I don't see any value in this" or "I think that the complexity of this would outweigh the value". For the record, I currently have no votes on the question or its answers.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@aCVn I think that the "complexity outweighs the value" can only be decided by the devs. Downvoting a feature request for that is stopping it from happening before problems with it are found.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@aCVn Oh, I hadn't noticed that post. If you want to close as dupe of that, I don't mind.

Canina‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Moshi Closed as duplicate.