Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Comments on Informing community users of new permissible features
Parent
Informing community users of new permissible features
It seems that permissible features which are voted up considerably will be added to a community. By "permissible" I mean those features which are not rejected by the community team due to some policies or technical considerations.
However, as we know well, only a small part of any community members participate in voting on feature-request meta posts because many people either are unaware of such requests or may think that their votes unlikely have a significant impact on adding a new feature to their community.
So, I think it is not a bad idea to add the following feature:
When a feature request is considered as permissible, a notification is sent to any user. In the notification or in the meta post there is an option like "I am not interested" so that a user can vote on it to show their indifference to acceptance or rejection of the proposed feature.
So, with the above feature the community team can see better how much interest in a feature exists among community users.
Please, no. With modern technology, we all get way too many nagware messages as it is. Let's not have Codidact add to …
3y ago
In addition to points already raised (two links) in answers here, Codidact already supports network-wide featuring of po …
3y ago
I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta o …
3y ago
Post
I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas:
-
Occasionally, manually (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that.
-
Promote participation in meta generally, with an educational onboarding process.
(To be clear, this isn't a feature request by itself, but a counterproposal to OP to use existing functionality to do something similar to the request.)
0 comment threads