I was one of the downvoters. Yes, the blatantly broken title made me immediately dislike the post. It would have needed to be a stellar post to recover. It wasn't. It seemed to be largely a bunch of disorganized thoughts with it not obvious what the question actually was. This was not helped by the very poor writing. Writing quality matters, a lot, whether you think it should or not. It may not be your fault you don't know English well, but it's not my fault either. Reading bad writing is quite annoying, and you have a history of such posts. I finally had enough, so I downvoted.

There is no excuse for something as obviously broken as your original title staying that way for "many hours". This means you didn't even look at the result after posting. I'd downvote it again just for that if I could.

I don't find your comment helpful; what is the "poor writing"? Do you think that I have a "history of bad posts" due to poor English per se?. Of course I reject the thought that this is "a bunch of disorganized thoughts" and that "There is no excuse for something as obviously broken as your original title".

Also Olin Lathrop‭ I won't be surprised that you have downvoted that post too, if so, why? Was my suggestion bad in your opinion?...

Yes, you have a history of posts that are annoying to read because of the bad English. Again, I realize this may not be your fault. However, that doesn't change the end result, which is ultimately all that matters.

This isn't the place for a detailed critique. If you want one, ask about it in the meta of the site where the original was posted.

Yes, to put it bluntly (since you asked), I downvoted your suggestion because you are asking for an unnecessary feature from the system because you got caught being sloppy.

Olin Lathrop‭ I reject the claim that that doesn't change the end result, which is ultimately all that matters; for you people and their problems won't matter, you don't speak for al users of the site; the site can be improved to be more usable to people who speak bad English such as myself.

I don't think I am sloppy to be caught or that the feature is unnecessary but okay, opinions exchanged...

Archiving this thread, because

1. it is not strictly related to this question but to the linked one and the matter discussed here should -- if it needs to be -- discussed on that post,

2. both sides have made their point clear and there isn't much purpose IMO to continue this discussion given its previous path and,

3. some comments in this thread are at least borderline aggressive for respectful discourse.

You are free to bring up the topic of expected language quality on the per-community metas if you wish to continue this discussion in a reasonable manner.