Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Renaming a tag rewrites history

Post

Renaming a tag rewrites history

+5
−0

I proposed an edit to a post to add the then-existing proposal tag.

The edit was approved, and the post currently shows as most recently edited by me. Both the suggested edit page and the post itself, however, shows the tag name as community-proposal.

It appears to me that someone, probably luap42 who approved the edit (but there's no obvious way to tell from the outside), also renamed the tag from proposal to community-proposal.

I don't disagree with this renaming of the tag; however, the act of renaming the tag rewrote history by claiming an edit different from the one made, and there is no indication in the history of any of the several earlier posts (multiple links) that this change has taken place. As far as anyone looking at the publicly visible post histories can tell, we've always been at war with Oceania the tag was always named community-proposal.

The history of a post should be immutable. This includes post metadata such as question tags. If some event triggers a change, for example by renaming a tag, this should be captured by a history event (which need not necessarily bump the post; often the point of choosing to rename a tag is that one does not want to bump every post that uses the old tag) which records the change.

Doing so would preserve the post history as a record of how it got from what was first posted to what it looks like now.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Just to confirm your suspicion: yes it was me who made that change to the tag (I also added the excer... (2 comments)
Just to confirm your suspicion: yes it was me who made that change to the tag (I also added the excer...
luap42‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Just to confirm your suspicion: yes it was me who made that change to the tag (I also added the excerpt). FYI I see some technical and non-technical issues with the suggestion (what if it is just a spelling error? couldn't this cause confusion too? what if the tag is used on a lot of posts?) and will add these as a comment later today/tomorrow.

Canina‭ wrote over 3 years ago

luap42‭ From an edit point of view, there is currently no difference between fixing a one-character typo in or completely replacing the post body; IMO tags shouldn't be different in terms of what's captured in the history. Both are examples of changes that made the post what it is at the time of viewing. In the name of consistency, the alternative would seem to be declaring that tags are always outside of the scope of the post history, which would have other IMO undesirable consequences.