Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Is there a Codidact community fitting for this question (or one emerging)?

Parent

Is there a Codidact community fitting for this question (or one emerging)?

+2
−4

Is there any Codidact network website in the horizon to accept this question?

Perhaps with some edit or conceptual change the question would be a good fit for scientific speculation?

Daily life computerized automation as impacting the number of marriages and live births

I understand that dating is quite of a new phenomenon and it was rare to nonexistent before the 19th century; marriages were typically a way to share resources between families to ensure survival and prosperity and was most often based on matchmaking rather than on anything we would name "dating" today.

In modern era marriages define mutual residence and having children with the common and challenged view that men should bring all or most salary and women should bring little to no salary and either way, mainly do housekeeping tasks.

Is there a theory according to which computerized automation (i.e. applications and robots), applied in daily life, somewhat decrease, or actually increase, the amount of family arrangements and live births?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

That would fall under "Sociology"... (3 comments)
I don't think the real question is about "automation". This is a classic question, examined in many p... (1 comment)
Post
+2
−0

If I understand Scientific speculation correctly, it's for extrapolating current science for some possible future developments, but in this potential question you want to get a) evidence (difficult for scientific speculation) and b) want to learn something about the current time (not some possible future). It's therefore simply a scientific question and would be ontopic on a suitable scientific site.

In particular, you are interested in human social behavior and the scientific category would be sociology but if you want to know more about impact on the ability of the human bodies to recreate, there might also be a biological/medical aspect to it.

It has nothing to do however with engineering, because the automation/usage of robots in your example question is just context.

There is currently no suitable site of Codidact for sociology, biology or medicine.

There is a biology proposal and a medical science proposal.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Scientific speculation and evidence or proof (3 comments)
Thanks, Proposals is a nice thing, but I believe that without massive creation of new Q&A websites, ... (5 comments)
Thanks, Proposals is a nice thing, but I believe that without massive creation of new Q&A websites, ...
deleted user wrote over 2 years ago

Thanks, Proposals is a nice thing, but I believe that without massive creation of new Q&A websites, this community may go quietly into the dark.

Trilarion‭ wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

True, without more communities you may not be able to ask more questions, but then if there are not enough answerers, what good does it do to ask a question. You need everything, askers, answerers, good software, ... it's a miracle if one can pull that off.

For example, I like your question here, but I could not answer it. I would not have the knowledge to do so.

As far as I know the current reluctance to open up new communities reflects the fear of empty/ghost towns. But then, not opening up new communities isn't helping much either. Personally, I decided to help with the QPixel development and leave the content creation task to others.

deleted user wrote over 2 years ago

Trilarion‭ I generally agree but I understand that currently this website has more answerers than askers so at the very least, adding more communities would be a good bet for keeping the site going.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Communities need people who are interested in answering those questions and are able to do so, though, deleted user. Having a place to ask questions that won't get decent answers, or maybe any answers at all, doesn't help, I'd like to see more, and more-active, communities here too -- for which we need the people.

Trilarion‭ wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

Monica Cellio‭ Opening up new communities may not help much, but not opening up may also not help much either. The question is where more people can come from. As a compromise of opening up lots of new communities or opening up none, I came up with let's open one. And it's not really new, I see.