Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Codidact Collab - should it be listed?

Parent

Codidact Collab - should it be listed?

+6
−0

The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown in the page footer, and on codidact.com.

There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called Codidact Collab. However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?

I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.

What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?


Presumably Collab would automatically become included if it were hosted on the same domain as the other communities, as suggested in Is there an argument for having Collab under codidact.com?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

That's a good question. We kept it separate because we didn't want to distract people from their primary focus, which we assumed would be on the communities here rather than the underpinnings. Collab is linked from the GitHub repository and we expected that to be the primary path in.

I don't have a strong opinion; it seemed like a good idea at the time, and I don't know of a reason we couldn't change it (though I don't know everything :-) ). We could also leave it the way it is and link it more prominently here, perhaps in the same part of the right column (on desktops) where we have the links for ads and donations.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

It's also a community, isn't it? (2 comments)
It's also a community, isn't it?
celtschk‭ wrote over 1 year ago

It's also a community, isn't it? Apart from that this specific community being concerned with the software this very site runs on, is there really any difference between that community and any other? If someone is not interested, he can ignore that community, just as I e.g. ignore the tabletop community without being harmed in any way by it being listed. Quite the opposite: Should I ever get interested in tabletop gaming, I already know the community exists.

trichoplax‭ wrote over 1 year ago

If this were an answer I'd upvote it.