Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Comments on Should we have organization accounts?
Parent
Should we have organization accounts?
I've seen many times something like "This is just my personal opinion, not of the team" when administrators such as Monica Cellio respond to posts. In my opinion, this is because of a lack of a way to distinguish the two through authorship alone.
Therefore, should shared/organization accounts be allowed? And should Codidact have one? This would give the ability to be explicit about whether one is acting on behalf of a larger group, such as Codidact or a more community specific moderation team.
On a technical level, organization accounts should probably be explicitly marked somehow as shared accounts, and be restricted from certain things like voting, earning[1] editing or moderation privileges, etc. to prevent abuse, but otherwise I don't see an issue with having them.
One could also do something like dev.to, where users can post on behalf of an organization they belong to.
That way, there is clear attribution to both parties, which also helps with transparency. However, this starts to complicate access rights and such, so it probably is something to be considered down the line rather than now.
-
but perhaps being able to be granted, for instance for a Codidact official account ↩︎
Post
What is preventing staff from using a second account, potentially using an anonymous alias? If they want to only express their personal opinions, then simply register a second account, without the admin/staff/moderator etc status attached to it.
As long as the multiple accounts aren't interacting with each other or used as "sock puppets", there's no problem with that approach.
0 comment threads