Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Why is there a voting limit?

Parent

Why is there a voting limit?

+6
−0

I was just informed I've reached my daily voting limit. I didn't know Codidact had a voting limit. Why is there a voting limit?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
Post
+7
−0

We had (and unfortunately still have) a nasty troll, that attempts to downvote all the questions and creates sock accounts for that to escape suspensions. To stop them, we had to employ some limitations. Voting limitations will likely stay in general, although we can and will improve the exact mechanism.

The process currently works like this:

You have at minimum N votes (defaults to 5, can be changed per-site). To that we add the number of reputation points you have minus 1 (your initial reputation). This results of the maximum amount of votes you can use in a rolling 24 hour window.

Update: There was a bug with calculating the vote limit, which has been fixed now.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
Harel13‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Understood. Thanks for the info!

Marco13‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

(Not sure if this is is worth an own Q/A:) : I'm currently receiving a popup message: "Failed: You have used your daily vote limit: 0/0 (403)" when trying to vote on site proposals. Is this only a glitch? (I could upvote other Q/As a few days ago... in doubt, I'd try again later...)

user53100‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@Marco13 If you haven't seen it yet, this issue has been answered in a comment to this question https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276923

jrh‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

Hm, that's unfortunate. I'd say it's really important for users to be able to casually vote on topics on meta even if they don't have any posts on meta, and also be able to vote regardless of whether their posts got downvoted on meta. I am glad I can still comment here, though. Is it against the rules to post "me too" comments? It's a bit counter-intuitive but it might actually be a good idea to encourage them on meta only if you are looking for feedback.

jrh‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

As in, maybe don't literally encourage "yeah I agree", but "yeah I agree because...." or "yeah I agree, and also..." (and naturally the opposite "I disagree because..." would be ok too)

luap42‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@jrh I'd personally say comments expressing their (dis-)agreement for a specific reason are okay (unlike pure "I agree" comments). Rate limits are currently being revised and I'll take your feedback re "initial votes" into account.