I just visited your profile on desktop in Chrome and I'm seeing the full image. Can you say more about your environment? (I tried changing the size of my browser window, but that didn't affect this.)

I'm using Firefox on Fedora Linux. At width 1068 pixels and narrower there is no scroll bar and the full image is visible. At width 1070 pixels and wider there is a scroll bar and a small amount of the image is cut off at the bottom.

It turns out that the containing div tag has a class of profile-text which is defined to have a max-height of 500 pixels, causing a scroll bar if the profile content (text or image or any combination) is taller than that in total.

It's overridden by a @media query in the CSS that removes the max-height if the window width is 64 em or less. I guess on my machine 64 em is roughly 1068 or 1069 pixels.

So it seems this was by design, but I don't know whether you still want that to be the design. Is it worth considering whether there needs to be a maximum height for the profile content, and if so whether it could be larger than 500 pixels?

It's also worth considering whether 1068 pixels width is where you want the switch between limited and unlimited height to happen. Maybe this was aimed at having no height limit on mobile? However, on a full HD screen viewing 2 windows side by side (so each is half width), the unlimited height will be triggered, even though it's a desktop setting.

Also, I don't know whether 64 em will reliably be 1068 pixels width. If someone overrides the font size in their browser, will this throw out the styling? Might be safer to define it in pixels instead of ems but worth double checking that. My personal leaning tends to be towards using rems for font sizing and pixels for screen size considerations.

I don't have a Chromium based browser available to test with so I don't know whether the font size on Chrome is different causing 64 em to be a much larger pixel value, or whether it's independent of browser and related to any fonts / font sizes you may have overridden.

I don't think it's uncommon for people to set a minimum font size in their browser to keep things readable (particularly on modern high resolution mobile devices) and some mobile phones have an operating system level user adjustable minimum font size which the browser may then pick up automatically. So we should probably have automated tests that take that into account at some point.