Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Edit activity show, but not allowed to approve

Parent

Edit activity show, but not allowed to approve

+3
−1

Now having a dot next to the "Edits" button to indicate pending edits brings up a new issue. It seems everyone is notified of all pending edits, whether they have the ability to approve them or not. Here is what I see when looking at the pending edits in Physics:

Users should only be notified of pending edits if there is something they can actually do about them.

Thanks for adding the notification dot, though. That's an improvement even with the above.


On a separate topic, shouldn't I have the ability to approve edits? I've written 35 posts in Physics, and have more than twice the rep of any other user there. Lighten up a bit.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−1

Even if you can't approve them, you might still be interested in the content of the suggested edits. Why remove the ability to see them?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Shouldn't be so in your face if you can't do anything about it. (2 comments)
The ability to view without being notified (2 comments)
Shouldn't be so in your face if you can't do anything about it.
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 1 year ago

*"Why remove the ability to see them?" Because if I can't do anything about the edit, I don't care. As others have pointed out, if I really want to watch such edits, there are already ways to seek them out. However, the vast majority of the time, the reason for looking over pending edits is so that I can handle them.

trichoplax‭ wrote about 1 year ago

If I've understood correctly, this answer isn't suggesting keeping the indicator circles for people without the Edit Posts ability, just keeping the ability to click on the Edits tab and see the suggested edits if desired.

(So it sounds like you both agree, just in different words.)