Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on New post type: a recap table

Post

New post type: a recap table

+1
−0

Motivation

I often want to use a table to:

  • Compare different solutions (for example, solutions addressing a new feature-request).
  • List related posts and duplicates (some topics can be extremely diluted in dozens of posts in a community or even spread over several communities. In this case it would sometimes seem useful to me to list all these related posts in one place and it could prevent new duplicates by giving more visibility to the initial post).

However, currently I don't know where to put such a "recap table" as it belongs neither to a question nor an answer.

On Meta I allow myself to be more lax on this aspect and I sometimes post this type of recap in an answer like here. But this way of doing things does not seem viable to me on a site other than Meta because if we do not respect the very principle of what a question or an answer to a question is, we risk losing the interest of a Q&A (IMHO).

Proposal

A solution could be to create a new type of post (let's call it "Recap post" but I'm not good at choosing names ;-) which can only be a table with a caption (and optionally also with a title: TBD).

The problem is, How to force the author to write only a table while allowing a lot of freedom on the content?

One solution could be to automatically detect if the post contains:

  • A table (typeset in Markdown).
  • A caption (limited in size, the limitation should probably be dynamically linked to the table size because a big table could need, for example more footnotes to explain their content) (below the table maybe).
  • (Optionally a title, limited in size, above the table).

If it is not possible to automatically detect such complex content, then the user can tell the number of rows and columns and then the corresponding table cells could be filled one by one in separated text boxes (idem for the caption and the title), something like that:

Example of manual table fill in

It is not optimal because it is cumbersome to fill in and the text is not contained in one single Markdown block. It makes links harder to make between cells and between cells and caption...(But even in that state I will definitely use it personally!)

Whatever the technical solution adopted, this post type could have the following feature (IMHO):

  • "Middle level post" maybe displayed just below the question and above the answers.
  • Freely editable: anybody with the Participate Everywhere privilege can edit the post directly
  • Cannot be voted on (TBD)? (or maybe yes if it encourage people to make it when necessary...)
  • No tags (TBD)?
  • Allowing comments (TBD)?
  • Maybe "owned" by the person who created them as for wiki posts?

EDIT after follow-up comment:

Issues

How to deal with answers posted after the "recap table post"? How to encourage people to update the "recap table post" if relevant?

The freely edit property is necessary but not sufficient (even if the owner is notified when a new answer is posted). Another solution to encourage editing would be to display a warning to a user posting a new answer (if a "table recap post" is already present), but again, maybe not sufficient.

Note that this issue is mainly present when comparing answer of the same question for example (but the range of use of this type of post would not be restricted to just this use)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

I like meta-answers, but ... (2 comments)
I like meta-answers, but ...
tripleee‭ wrote over 1 year ago

The idea of meta-answers is nice but I don't know that they would require a specific format. Perhaps some sort of marking to indicate an answer as a meta-analysis would be useful, but then how do you cope when new answers are posted after the meta-answer? Perhaps simply encouraging answerers to compare theirs to previous answers would be sufficient.

zetyty‭ wrote over 1 year ago

Good points thank you. I make an edit after you comment. If you think it is too much opinion based I would be glad to make a second edit ;-). To avoid misunderstanding, for me this new post type could be use, not only for answer review/comparison, but also for listing goods answer related to a topic (e.g. A workflow to start learning Ruby). Also listing all duplicates and related question in order to make the initial post more visible and so prevents from new duplicates (In TeX.SE I found more than 40 duplicates to a question!). In these case, I think the fact that new answers coming after could be less a problem than if the recap is about just the answer of the current question. But the issue you pointed out still remains so thanks again!