Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Assessing the 5 tag limit

Parent

Assessing the 5 tag limit

+5
−1

We currently have a limit of 5 tags per question.

Should we keep this the same or would any changes be of benefit?

For example:

  • Should the limit be higher or lower?
  • Should there be different limits for different contexts:
    • Different communities?
    • Different categories?
    • Different post types?
  • Is there a need for a limit?
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Origin of the tag limit (3 comments)
Post
+4
−0

I think this also depends on the community, so I suggest changing the limit at the community level instead of having a limit across all the Codidact communities.

For the specific case of Software Development, the five-tag limit seems to work fine. If we aim to have meaningful tags as shown by Lundin in this post, having a rather low tag limit is actually useful because we want to avoid:

  • generic tags
  • tags about the question content
  • company names in tags
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Tag naming vs number of tags (1 comment)
A tag limit is not the best means to prevent these problems; it even risks being counter-productive. (1 comment)
Tag naming vs number of tags
Lundin‭ wrote about 1 year ago

I think tag naming vs number of tags are separate issues. There are situations at SO where 5 tags could be too restrictive. Example from programming: you wish to ask about the feature "anonymous structures and unions" and how it is different between the C11 and C++11 standards. Here the tags anonymous-struct and anonymous-union would both have been appropriate. It would not have been wrong to use struct or union either. The question is specifically about C11 vs C++11 so the tags C11 and C++11 are necessary. Each of these have a tag usage rule stating that they should always be used in combination with the parent tag C or C++. We end up with anonymous-struct, anonymous-union, (struct), (union), c, c11, c++, c++11. Even if we tried to be restrictive, we've already used up 4 tags for programming language specs alone. Far from ideal.