Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on What is the appropriate tone for feedback on questions and answers?

Parent

What is the appropriate tone for feedback on questions and answers?

+0
−3

When giving feedback (comments, edits, reactions) what is the appropriate tone?

In other words, how should you phrase your feedback?

  • Should you assume knowledge of all site rules?
  • Should you assume knowledge of only "main" site rules but not all?
  • How friendly should you be? Is it okay to sound angry when you're angry at new users breaking the rules? Do you have to sound friendly and helpful even though you don't genuinely feel that way?
  • Should you give feedback in a negative tone? Meaning chastising the poster for breaking a rule.

Note, I am not asking about the substance of the feedback. For this question, let's assume whatever you are giving feedback on is something the recipient genuinely did wrong (ie. against the site rules).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−0
  • Should you assume knowledge of all site rules?
  • Should you assume knowledge of only "main" site rules but not all?

I'm not sure what distinction you are trying to make here between "all site rules" and "only main site rules". In general I think it's reasonable to assume familiarity with rules but also allow for that someone might simply have missed something, might not realize the implications of something they posted (most people on Earth don't have English as their first language, and nuances can be difficult to get right in addition to being culturally dependent), and so on.

In general, assume good intent.

  • How friendly should you be? Is it okay to sound angry when you're angry at new users breaking the rules? Do you have to sound friendly and helpful even though you don't genuinely feel that way?

If you can't be friendly and helpful (or nice and respectful) in guiding someone, I really recommend that you don't even try. Raise a moderator flag instead and go on with your day. That's what moderator flags are for. In the words of the code of conduct, always be constructive.

  • Should you give feedback in a negative tone? Meaning chastising the poster for breaking a rule.

Absolutely not. Borrowing from the code of conduct: be nice; be respectful; always be constructive.

Chastising a user, even if you feel that the user this is directed at somehow "deserves" it, would certainly be valid reason for someone else (that user or another person) to raise a moderator flag regarding that content.

If you see a moderator doing it, raise that with the Codidact team. See the "contact us" link in the page footer.

The Codidact code of conduct really isn't long or complicated, and is intended to lay the land for interactions across the network. If for any reason you feel you can't follow it in posting something, please refrain from that post. It will save everyone grief.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Which reminds me of something similar from another forum. It's an educational forum for electricians,... (1 comment)
What to do when this is not followed (2 comments)
What to do when this is not followed
matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago

I have seen feedback on this site that doesn't seem to follow these rules. What's the solution in those cases? Is it just to flag the feedback and say it doesn't follow CoC?

Canina‭ wrote about 1 year ago · edited about 1 year ago

matthewsnyder‭ As a general rule of thumb: Yes.

If you see something which you feel is in violation of the code of conduct, flag it for moderator attention.

If you see a moderator acting in a way which you feel is in violation of the code of conduct, use the contact page to contact the Codidact team.

It's treading a fine line trying to intervene yourself. I won't say "don't", but you should make very sure that you don't overstep the CoC yourself in doing so.

The moderator who handles your flag will probably appreciate a description of how you feel that the content you're flagging is in violation of the CoC, but any flag description is better than no flag for such a case. You might not receive personal feedback beyond the helpful/declined flag response, and depending on specifics it may be a while before a flag is actually marked as resolved (sometimes it's helpful to leave a flag pending while investigating and discussing between moderators), but moderator flags are looked at promptly.