Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on What is Codidact's policy regarding artificial intelligence-generated content?

Parent

What is Codidact's policy regarding artificial intelligence-generated content?

+1
−3

Is AI content banned, or allowed if attributed to an AI?

Are there further contextual rules regarding AI, for example, how much of a post may consist of AI-composed content?

Will the justificational principles behind these rules be available to read somewhere?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Possible duplicate (2 comments)
Post
+4
−0

Due to a technical limitation (working on it...) I can't mark this as a duplicate of our network gen-AI policy, but see that link. To summarize:

  • Presenting non-original work as your own is a violation of our plagiarism policies, regardless of who or what wrote the material you used. To the extent it's allowed, you must attribute.

  • AI-generated content has problems including accuracy, which works against our goal of high-quality knowledge-sharing. By default, posts consisting entirely of LLM- and AI-generated content are not considered acceptable on our platform.

  • We give our communities as much autonomy as possible. Any community is welcome to adopt a more liberal policy, so long as our attribution rules are followed.

Posts that include, but don't consist entirely of, AI content are judgement calls. For example, the human posting the quote might add some value -- such as testing and confirming the accuracy of an answer, or adding helpful explanation. But if the post is just "I asked ChatGPT and here's what it said", it's probably going to get deleted.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Thank you. Can the content of that post be added to the Codidact Site Policy page? https://meta.co... (2 comments)
Thank you. Can the content of that post be added to the Codidact Site Policy page? https://meta.co...
Julius H.‭ wrote 9 months ago

Thank you.

Can the content of that post be added to the Codidact Site Policy page? https://meta.codidact.com/help

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 9 months ago

That's a good idea, thanks.