Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
What is Codidact's policy regarding artificial intelligence-generated content?
Is AI content banned, or allowed if attributed to an AI?
Are there further contextual rules regarding AI, for example, how much of a post may consist of AI-composed content?
Will the justificational principles behind these rules be available to read somewhere?
1 answer
Due to a technical limitation (working on it...) I can't mark this as a duplicate of our network gen-AI policy, but see that link. To summarize:
-
Presenting non-original work as your own is a violation of our plagiarism policies, regardless of who or what wrote the material you used. To the extent it's allowed, you must attribute.
-
AI-generated content has problems including accuracy, which works against our goal of high-quality knowledge-sharing. By default, posts consisting entirely of LLM- and AI-generated content are not considered acceptable on our platform.
-
We give our communities as much autonomy as possible. Any community is welcome to adopt a more liberal policy, so long as our attribution rules are followed.
Posts that include, but don't consist entirely of, AI content are judgement calls. For example, the human posting the quote might add some value -- such as testing and confirming the accuracy of an answer, or adding helpful explanation. But if the post is just "I asked ChatGPT and here's what it said", it's probably going to get deleted.
1 comment thread
1 comment thread