Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Can I use @Username to notify users from within my question or answer?

Parent

Can I use @Username to notify users from within my question or answer?

+6
−6

If I write a question or an answer, sometimes I want to notify specific users because of the context of my question or answer (for example if I post a follow-up question to an answer from another question).

Can I use the comment function @Username to notify users from within my question or answer?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−1

This is not only a bad idea for the reasons already outlined in existing answers, but:

Codidact is first and foremost a Q/A network, not a discussion forum, not a helpdesk, not a chat service, and not a social media. Being able to mention users in posts would directly contradict the goals of this network. For a curated repository of quality answers to quality questions, it makes no sense to have mentions of users in posts. When I search the internet for answers and solutions to questions or problems, I want to find content that's suited for me (or anybody else who might land on the network), not content suited for a specific user.

Allowing pings in posts hurts our abilities to build an impersonal knowledge repository with the purpose of reuse.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Being able to mention (not pinging) users is absolute necessary in questions and answers. Everything ... (6 comments)
Being able to mention (not pinging) users is absolute necessary in questions and answers. Everything ...
samcarter‭ wrote 9 months ago · edited 9 months ago

Being able to mention (not pinging) users is absolute necessary in questions and answers. Everything else would make it unnecessarily difficult to comply with CC-by licenses of many posts all around the internet. Being able to mention user names also helps to differentiate between different approaches in answers.

samcarter‭ I fail to see the applications you mention being realistic or useful. Can you share some examples?

My answer concerns Q/A posts (questions and answers) (mainly the main category), not blog, nor comments.

samcarter‭ Also, since you mention licenses; I figured it would be fairly obvious I’m talking about referring to other users on the network for a personal exchange with them. Quoting content, and providing necessary attribution, is of course not something I’d ban.

From the question I answered:

I want to notify specific users

That’s what I have a problem with. Or otherwise crafting an answer in the context of a particular named user.

Andreas witnessed the end of the world today‭ wrote 9 months ago · edited 9 months ago

Being able to mention user names also helps to differentiate between different approaches in answers.

I’ll make the assumption that I understand what you mean here. I’ve seen it on Stack Overflow, and even done it myself, so I understand its uses. But I still don’t like it. It’s a very crude way to solve something that the software should’ve aided us in.

samcarter‭ wrote 9 months ago

Quoting content, and providing necessary attribution, is of course not something I’d ban.

How will you differentiate if a user mentions somebody to provide attribution or for other reasons?

I very much agree that notifying specific users in posts is not a good idea, but mentioning is imho completely OK. We are all humans here, it should be ok to treat each other like a human and say things like "Inspired by the answer by @Donald Duck " instead of just giving the link.

trichoplax‭ wrote 9 months ago

The advantage of linking to an answer rather than refering to it as "the answer by @sam" is that in general a user may post more than 1 answer to the same question, and at the time of mentioning them they may have only posted 1 answer. This means the mention is unambiguous at the time of posting, but becomes ambiguous later.

I can see a benefit to having shortcut ways of linking to answers.