Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Show last user names if users change their user names

+3
−12

Recently, some users who are here for a longer time changed their usernames. It often happened that I saw a well-written question or answer from a user I supposedly have never seen before with a high activity. Of course, I know then that it must be someone who has just changed names but it sometimes it's really hard to know who this user was before changing names.

Would it be possible to list last used user names on the profile for a given time frame (for example three months)? This way, it's possible to associate the new user name with the actions of the old user name1 without having to go through all posted questions and answers.

  1. This also helps to prevent cases where troublesome users change names to temporarily lay low before they are "discovered" again.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)

2 answers

+11
−1

I disagree that this would be desirable.

First, unless we want people to focus on the user, instead of the content, who posts something should have little or no bearing on anything. Act on whether it's good or bad content (or proposal, or whatever), not on who posted it. The only case where who posts something should be relevant is for moderation purposes, and for that, the display name shouldn't matter; moderators need to have access to historical interactions from the user regardless of the display name used anyway.

Second, people sometimes want a break with a previous name they've used. Maybe they feel it doesn't represent them any longer; maybe they want more privacy than their old display name affords them (for example, changing from their real name to something else); maybe they realized that it could be misinterpreted; maybe they want to use the display name to prominently make a statement; or maybe they have some completely different reason for wanting to change it. In any case, they're changing their display name; certainly anyone who does so should realize that this will change the name their contributions are displayed as attributed to. It won't be a completely clean break if they have interacted with the site in any significant way, but they can still get most of the benefit without having to create a brand new account.

Third, it's potentially complex. Sure, the easy approach is to just show the most recent previous display name until a given amount of time has passed since the change was made. But that just means that people need to change their display name twice in short succession (by choice or by accident) for the old name to disappear. So now we're potentially considering displaying a history of past display names for a period of time. Trying to lay that out well in the UI is bound to be difficult, and of course each such past display name will need to be tracked separately.

Fourth, every once in a while, people actually set their display names to something that is genuinely offensive. (I've seen it happen, though thankfully not on Codidact.) If that happens, it needs to be possible to minimize the exposure of the offensive display name. Displaying old display names, even if only for a period, increases the amount of exposure such an offensive display name gets. If a history of past display names is displayed, not just the most recent one, they could also use that to display a message that would be more difficult to redact. This can perhaps be worked around by allowing a moderator or site admin to redact such a history entry, but now we're piling even more complexity on top of this.

There are probably more arguments against this that I'm just not thinking of at the moment.

Seems to me that it is easier to focus, first and foremost, on the content of each user's contributions.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
+2
−0

I upvoted, but on the condition that this be an explicit opt-in at the time of change (privacy by default).

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »