Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Indicate change in reputation in voting summary

+0
−1

In the Vote Summary tab of the user page, each of a users posts shows how many votes up and down:

Two posts showing 1 upvote each

This shows voting, but does not make clear how this affects reputation. In this example, the first post is a Question in the Challenges category, and the upvote results in +10 reputation. The second post is an Article in the Sandbox category, and results in +0 reputation (no change).

Could the change in reputation be listed on this page alongside the voting figures, to make the different reputation values of votes on different post types in different categories more discoverable?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

Counter-proposal: how about if we add the rep settings at the top of the Vote Summary page, instead of computing and adding them to each entry? I'm imagining something like this:

Reputation for up/down votes:
Q&A: Question +5/-2, Answer +10/-2
Sandbox: Article +0/-0
Meta: Question +0/-0, Answer +0/-0

One line per category, listing each votable[1] post type allowed in that category and the rep levels.

This makes the values visible to everybody without adding a second number for each entry on the page.

Or if there's a better place to expose this information, let's do that. People shouldn't have to guess what the rep changes mean, I agree.


  1. Whether a post can be voted on is a property of the post type. For an example of non-votable posts, see the Descriptions category on the Proposals site. ↩︎

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »