Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
How to deal with links to commerce?
An answer in the Linux Codidact is using the price of solid state drives and hard disks to clarify its point, and does so by linking to these products in Amazon.
Leaving my personal judgement of Amazon apart, I would nonetheless remove the links as the prices are what is substantial to the answer, not the exact products in sale.
Do we have a policy on linking to commercial services? If not yet, should the links be removed?
2 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Leaving my personal judgement of Amazon apart, I would nonetheless remove the links as the prices are what is substantial to the answer, not the exact products in sale.
If you remove the links, that would reduce the proposed solution to a baseless claim. Without links, I would advocate for removing the bit about buying a bigger drive entirely because without evidence the price claims are useless, and the whole "solution" falls apart.
The common thread here is that the question is asking for a DIY solution, but the effort of the DIY is actually not worth it compared to simply buying a cheap product. Of course, that only works if the product is actually cheap - you can't have a discussion of that if you can't put a price. And the price is useless if it can't be verified.
We do have a tradition on QA sites that contents of links should be reproduced in the post, in case the link dies later. Would it be better if instead of linking to Amazon, I provided detailed specs of the drives I was thinking of and stated that I can currently find them on sale for a certain price?
Leaving my personal judgement of Amazon apart
I suspect many people would feel very differently about posting links to small, ethical, specialty retailers vs. large and controversial companies like Amazon. But that's irrelevant if you want to indiscriminately ban all product links.
It's probably worth a mention that in my opinion, the best option would be to quarantine all product linking to one site like my proposal where the exact manner of product referencing can be moderated to extract some common good out of it. Meanwhile, other sites can ban any hint of product-purchase-related discussion with no downside, because those things can still be discussed in the quarantine. That said, the proposal I made has not attracted interest, so maybe that's just me.
0 comment threads
Please don't use/allow links like this
It's fundamentally still advertising
Notwithstanding what manufacturers or retailers are suggested, and regardless of apparent intent, links like these still fundamentally serve the purpose of advertising a product or service. If this answer had come from a new user, I would have flagged it as spam. Ignoring such links sets a terrible precedent by discouraging vigilance against spammers. It's worth noting here especially that undisclosed affiliate links aren't always trivial to detect.
It's really not necessary
Considering the purpose in context, simply stating that SSD storage can be obtained relatively cheaply is more than enough. If we're going to be doing subjective comparisons, it would be more interesting in practical terms to talk about, say, the relative size of low-end storage devices vs. a typical Linux installation.
Ideas like this are perfectly well expressed by giving rough ranges and speaking in general terms. If the community really feels that evidence is necessary, it would be better to use a secondary source, e.g. a link to an editorial on a hardware review site.
Temporal concerns
Storage is likely to continue getting cheaper. The numbers provided here will go out of date soon enough. Does it benefit anyone to keep them up to date? Are the numbers necessary to convey what they're intended to convey (which doesn't actually appear to be all that objective)?
More interesting, anyway, is the cost ratio between SSDs and HDDs, byte for byte.
Cultural and personal concerns
"Cheap" is relative - considering both the local economy and personal preferences. Also, individual demands for storage space vary greatly. Putting numbers on the storage cost doesn't really change the fact that this is putting forward an opinion. It could be useful to put forward a reality check, but frame-challenging "do you need HDD storage at all?" isn't going to work well in a vacuum, especially not when the frame challenge isn't actually described as such.
0 comment threads
2 comment threads