Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

The question captions are too light-blue

+2
−1

The captions of the questions are too light-blue in the list of the questions, so difficult to read on the white background. Could they be made of slightly darker cue? Maybe, even black?

Image_alt_text

History

2 comment threads

Can you show a screenshot where you mark what you mean with "question caption"? The title of the ques... (5 comments)
For the record, the contrast is 4.3, which is just below WCAG AAA's 4.5 requirement for large text (a... (1 comment)

2 answers

+3
−0

Matching accessibility recommendations is good

Although Olin's answer may be useful to some people, I don't necessarily think that this is solely a screen adjustment issue. Some people benefit from more contrast than others, and we could match to the contrast levels recommended for accessibility (which Zoe's comment suggests we are not far from matching already).

We could also consider the effects of blue light reduction

Another thing to bear in mind is that some screens can be set to reduce blue light, either consistently or at certain times of day to help with eye strain and sleeping patterns. This can happen slowly and subtly enough that it is not obvious that it has happened (if the setting is on by default). This gives a significant reduction in contrast for some colours of text.

So in addition to meeting standardised accessibility recommendations, it may also be worth testing the user interface on various operating systems (across desktop and mobile) that provide blue light reduction.

I have noticed this reduction in contrast, and I've also noticed that some panels on Codidact that have a different colour background lose that colour distinction from the rest of the page when the blue light is reduced.

History

1 comment thread

I only have experience with two tools, f.lux and macOS night shift. They will shift the appearance of... (2 comments)
+0
−2

I don't know what you mean by "question captions", so I looked at the question titles in the screenshot you posted. The darkest pixels (that weren't blended with the background) of the blue text are RBG (.17, .50, .74). That should provide plenty of contrast with the white background. This text is easily visible in my browser when looking at your screen shot.

The problem is therefore some setting on your end. Check the "monitor" color adjustment settings, or maybe some color or contrast settings in your browser. One way to distinguish between browser and system settings is to look at your screen shot with an image app, not the browser. If it looks the same as in the browser, then it must be a system setting.

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »