Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Nick Alexeev
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #290455 |
Neither am I opposed to duplicating the comment (the converted answer) in these rare occasions. We are displaying one thread at a time. But it probably depends on the backend implementation too. I can make up an example, if you’re interested. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290455 |
@#64277 I haven’t got a preference for one approach over another. I haven’t got a real life example, because I haven’t seen an answer that needed converting into a comment, and itself had multiple comment threads. Maybe it’s a rare corner case. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290455 |
@#64277 The 2nd thought was to flatten the thread structure, and combine all threads into one with the answer converted to comment on top. It would work for a majority of answer to comment conversions. Answers which get converted into comments rarely have multi-branched discussions where each bran... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290455 |
@#64277 The 1st thought was to preserve threads, and add the answer converted to comment on top of each one. The answers which get converted into comments are usually short, so adding them to each thread shouldn’t clutter things too much. Maybe add an automatic explanation [apology for repeating] ... (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #278929 |
There's the second reason why this is outdated. [Meta votes was removed from the reputation in 2023. [Cheers!]](https://electrical.codidact.com/posts/288720) Could you change the tag of the question from "bydesign" to "completed", please? (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #290455 | Initial revision | — | 11 months ago |
| Question | — |
How to convert an answer to comment and include the comments under the answer into the new comment thread? Is there a way to convert an answer to a comment and include the existing comments under the answer into the new comment thread? There’s no option for it in the convert-to-comment dialog. Is there a workaround? (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Edit | Post #289816 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Tags don't match between display mode and edit mode I noticed an anomaly when I went to edit a question. The tags in the display mode don't match the tags in the edit mode. I didn't change the tags, that's how they initialized when I opened the edit mode. Question where I noticed the anomaly: https://electrical.codidact.com/posts/285721 I didn... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #281615 |
The edit approvals cover the cases when Alice edits Bob's post. Bumping is a form of review which covers the case when Bob edits his own posts, or a moderator edits Bob's post. So, bumping is a part of the edit review system. Low participation is a temporary condition. That shall pass. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281615 |
@Lundin There is a reason why edits bump the posts. It helps moderate the edits. When the post is bumped, more folks will look at the edits. They can spot abuses such as editing spam into an old post, content destruction, etc. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279695 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Future planning: what user preferences would be useful? Enable/disable display of Hot Notable Network Questions. [If we ever have the Notable Network Questions at all.] (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278888 |
I agree that Power User should include PC hardware. It shouldn't include all other consumer electronics, though, because that would attract a lot of... consumers, and the signal/noise would suffer. There should be a separate site for consumer electronics. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279226 |
The [other bookmarking solution at that link](https://blog.elink.io/bookmarking-tools/) are for casual readers of blogs (I use Pocket from that list). Codidact patrons will have a broader range of interactions. There's a larger number of various actions one may want defer. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278688 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279177 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279177 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279177 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Multi-colored bookmarks We'll want to have bookmarks, eventually. It would be nice to have bookmarks with some kind of categorization. For example, favorites/bookmarks with different colors, because I want to come back to messages for different reasons. - Material for future reference. - Read later when I have tim... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278908 |
I'll upvote this, if the second and fifth items in the on-topic list has a provision along the lines of "or a separate site for office software [working name Office Suite]" . There will be enough questions to go around for both Power User and Office Suite. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278966 |
There's will be enough questions about office suites for a separate site. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278838 |
[on a different note] As it stands right now, the Software Development site (Software.Codidact) covers anything from Excel formulas for database administration. It doesn't have a focus. It doesn't match the Software Development name. It needs a hard restart. If it were up to me, I would remake i... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278838 |
I don't think that we should close the Office Suite proposal. There's will be enough questions to go around for both Office Suite and Power User. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278929 |
@ArtOfCode (or @ meta mods), could you please remove the [status-bydesign] tag? Then I'll re-label the question as a feature request, and rewrite it a bit too. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278929 |
Even though [for better, or for worse] a sum-total reputation won't be around for too much longer, the votes on questions and answers are going to go into calculation of [trust levels (privileges, abilities)](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276209#answer-276675).
So, I propose a feature. Each... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278928 |
@Dani I expect that the rep will be the same, and it will be equal to the rep on the main site (subject matter site). I expect that the votes on meta don't count toward reputation. For example, Alice has an answer on a subject matter site with 3 upvotes, and another answer on the meta attached to ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278928 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278928 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278928 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278928 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
A vote in the meta category for the EE site reflected in my reputation. Is that a bug? We've got a category for meta posts on the electrical engineering (EE) vsite. I've noticed that votes on my posts in the meta reflect in my reputation on the EE site. The votes on a local meta-EE shouldn't reflect on the reputation on EE. This looks like a bug (or a lack of feature), or a missing ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278722 |
I post multiple comments, if I notice that there are multiple quite separate thoughts (i.e. multiple paragraphs) in my comment. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278776 |
Thanks for the link to the dump on Archive.org . I didn't know that Archive.org maintains a dump in a form that's easy to grab. It may come handy some day. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278688 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278688 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278688 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278688 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Hot Network Questions like feature? The easiest answer to HNQ is to not have such a feature at all. I thinks that HNQ are an ill-conceived feature of StackExchange. They are more of a distraction than good. A more permissive way of dealing with HNQ is to let each user control if he wants to see the HNQs. Yet more permissive app... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275846 |
Add "engineering" to the URL, somehow, please. To the average public, "electrical" includes electrical wiring of houses and cars, which will be off--topic for Electrical Engineering. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275808 |
I'll second Dave about footnotes. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275808 |
@Monica I joined EE.SE before they installed CircuitLab. Everyone used their favorite schematic capture program and uploaded schematics as pictures. There are free and opensource schematic capture programs (LTSpice, KiCAD, ExpressPCB for example). Those who weren’t comfortable with schematic capt... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275837 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Proposing Electrical Engineering site ElectricalEngineering should be a good URL. EE (electrical engineering) or EEE (electrical and electronic engineering, as in IEEE) should be good too. Unless we want to go for something more humorous or abstract. "Electronics" in "electronics.stackexchange.com" was a poor choice of a word. ... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |