Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for dmckee
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #279832 |
The status of experimental questions was a matter that came up over and over again on the site SomewhereElse. In particular many, *many* experimental questions were accused of being not about physics one way or another. The lines between experimental design and various engineering disciplines; experi... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278340 |
Experimental nuclear/particle physicist by training. I taught the subject at university for five years, and moderated physics.SE for more than nine years. But I don’t anticipate have time for more than casual use of the proposed site here. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276785 |
@luap42 I can, indeed. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276785 |
@Monica I'm unlikely to get back to it today, so I'll just wait for the time being. Thanks. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276785 |
@luap42 I'm short on time again, so I'll have to get back to it later, but thanks. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276785 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276785 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Deleted posts should be accessible to the creator *or* there should be a warning I started writing an answer on Scientific Speculation and accidentally submitted it in a very incomplete state. Then my toddler came by and started making it hard to work on the stub. So, using my finely honed Stack Exchange reflexes I decided to delete the post until I could edit in into shape. O... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276703 |
I fear that if the site grows to any size at all this becomes unwieldy. I can think of ten or more languages that have significant, on-going user bases without breaking a sweat. You either have to have a tight policy on what languages qualify (likely to be perceived as exclusionary and unwelcoming) o... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276516 |
Seeing it on iOS/chrome as well. Though it’s fairly modest in my case. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276414 |
When I use the Native filter I'm getting some posts where the question is not marked as imported but the answers are. (I'm guessing these are questions claimed by a local user...) Is this the right behavior for OP's use case? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276401 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Hot Network Questions like feature? A suggestion that I recall seeing on MSE is that hot network questions get a feature similar that protection on Stack Exchange where users need some (presumably very low) threshold of trust earned in the site to be able to vote on questions given broader visibility. In Stack Exchange terms that me... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276255 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How do we handle overlap? There are two sides to this question Questions that are on-topic on more than one site There were three principle I followed on Stack Exchange for questions that would be at home on more than one site They may be asked on either site. This does lead to duplicates on the network whic... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276141 |
I'm with @Alan on the matter of naming: the name should not exclude a desired audience segment. So if we want all skilled and aspiring programmers then the name should not suggest we only want pros. I'm thinking of the SE site "Theoretical physics". The founders insisted that they were creating a sit... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276162 |
We can hope, but not guarantee, that well receied answers that remain correct will continue to garner votes for passing traffic fast enough to keep them on the top. Obviously that requires sufficient traffic to the site. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |