Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for jrh
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278386 |
@Lundin "maybe nobody cares about imaginary internet points" -- I think the points might get more important as the site gets bigger. Deleting and editing content will get more important later. It doesn't take any rep to attempt to document something, comment, or answer, which are probably the most im... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276995 |
I'd be a casual visitor for the most part, I'd likely mostly just read, occasionally answer. I've got knowledge in some parts of the Linux kernel and how to configure a system, but I am not much of a script writer in the usual Linux sense (no Perl, only basic shell scripts), I'm fluent in Python thou... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
...and a third thing, collecting answer and question votes on here might be a lot easier than on SO, I vaguely remember people saying that votes used to be a lot more common on SO when the site was small (more attention to each post), and plus there's tons of subjects that have zero content at all. T... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
... also I think SO's need for edits comes partially from the "never delete an answer" policy, a lot of the posts I would like to edit were technically correct but deeply flawed. The other kind are posts that are outdated due to dead links. Hypothetically if reviewers had domain knowledge I would als... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278234 |
While it's still very early, I think this might scale better than SO's system, I always thought it was very silly that I could never get the ability to edit posts without review even if I had hundreds or thousands of approved suggested edits. One thing to note is, we might not really know how good th... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276798 |
As in, maybe don't literally encourage "yeah I agree", but "yeah I agree because...." or "yeah I agree, and also..." (and naturally the opposite "I disagree because..." would be ok too)
(more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276798 |
Hm, that's unfortunate. I'd say it's really important for users to be able to casually vote on topics on meta even if they don't have any posts on meta, and also be able to vote regardless of whether their posts got downvoted on meta. I am glad I can still comment here, though. Is it against the rule... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277244 |
I can't vote but I'd like to show support for this (it's weird to require rep on meta itself and I wish Codidact did not continue that tradition from Meta.SE, especially considering this site is quite young and has a small audience at the moment; are admins worried about spam?) , so I'll just mention... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |