Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for ShowMeBillyJo
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #277924 |
@ArtOfCode I think that's fine for the dev team tracking their own progress _in Trello._ But for user-facing progress indicators--which these tags are--saying an item is complete before it's deployed is like announcing to a packed restaurant that desert is ready to be served, but by the way we won't ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277875 |
"I wouldn't want commenters to essentially litter my perfect post with little icons all over the place." This _really_ rubs me the wrong way. It practically screams entitlement--not the attitude of a community builder IMO. That out of the way, I actually like the suggestion. MS Word and Google Docs d... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277549 |
@manassehkatz I didn't know either and had to look it up. Tombstone, per Wikipedia: _In mathematics, the tombstone, halmos, end-of-proof, or Q.E.D. symbol "∎" (or "□") is a symbol used to denote the end of a proof, in place of the traditional abbreviation "Q.E.D." for the Latin phrase "quod erat demo... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277572 |
Post edited: Clarification of points |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277572 |
Sorry, I should've been clearer, and I'll update my post to clarify. In this case, what I meant by "quorum" was, "How many Panel members are required to actually move business?" (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277572 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Second Iteration of Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel A few things re. conducting Panel business: 1. I propose codifying the number required for quorum, with "quorum" in this case meaning the number of Panel members required to be present in order to conduct business. a. Do quorum rules apply to offline/asynchronous votes (such as in a Codidact... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277348 |
Maybe using sub-articles here would clarify the intent. "**ARTICLE 18.1** In emergency situations…" "**ARTICLE 18.2** In cases of legal obligations…" (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277023 |
I agree with its current placement after the body. Often, when I don't write my titles/subjects/summaries after I've written my main copy, I end up rewriting them anyway. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275836 |
Off-topic unsure: 3) Makes me sad, but makes sense. The basics of LARP and TRPG are so entwined I'd hate to see it left out in the cold entirely, though. If we do expand to include it, maybe the base expectations (per Monica) of those questions are different enough to merit their own category, like a... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275836 |
Off-topic unsure: 1) I think this content would be on-topic for the site, but would require chat or discussion vs Q&A. 2) Agree, off-topic unless it's scoped very specifically to the context of influence on/by TRPGs. 2/ (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275836 |
I like this proposal. Name 👍🏻. Slug 👍🏻. Categories: Gallery is a great idea, I see Contests fitting within it (sharing over competition). Stories could also be called Adventures, I like where you're headed with emphasizing the intent with the name. Idea Generation is intriguing, but deffo needs to be... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74897 |
I don't agree with the suggestion. Just because a particular sub-topic is popular doesn't mean it should be the default. I think the approach that makes more sense is to start off as general TRPG and then split D&D off if/when it makes sense, _a la_ Software Development and language-specific sites. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276994 |
I'd be somewhere on the spectrum of enthusiast to expert. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →