Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Jirka Hanika‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #292975 Initial revision 7 days ago
Question Where do the ToS draw the line regarding what a spam account is?
The general policy on spam accounts with advertisements stored in their user profile (and no account activity) was already discussed here. I´m looking at an account whose current advertisement method within our network is literally their distinct account name only. To gain search engine atten...
(more)
7 days ago
Comment Post #285076 As an extraordinary, one off measure, even a lot of the existing sites could be reverted to a beta status (after double checking with their respective communities). Independently of the beta/non-beta classification (whose impact has not been spelt out in much detail - it's presumably mostly a co...
(more)
almost 3 years ago
Comment Post #282138 More voting on this item either way would probably help.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #282138 @mattbrent - Screen space isn't entirely free. Smaller screen, older eyes... suddenly there's just a thin slit left for the "payload" (the actual Q+A item list). Also, leaner UI tends to be more useable if you are new to it. Of course, this isn't to say that the cost of making the UI more compact w...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #281449 @sau226 - Perhaps 80% helpfulness and at least 2 flags in total? (Language & Linguistics has handled approximately 2 helpful flags over the first year of its existence in total, I think. Not counting flag testing.) I'm trying to hint that a more direct access at the settings might be easier to tai...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278890 @Lundin, I'd expect the asker to start with Google Translate, web searches, and to only pull the heavy weight of asking in one of the Q&A forums mentioned in this thread only about the remaining bits that remain unexplained. There are numerous web sites specifically dedicated to collecting and discu...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278890 *Some* questions about song lyrics could probe the potential of Language & Linguistics, regardless of the language of the song. But it probably won't work well if the motivation behind the question is a translation request, cultural studies, or something inherently artistic or musical. That is, if ...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #277961 I suppose that a debated "dangerous" mark could be rendered obsolete by editing the post to become sufficiently explicit on the contested subject matter. Readers then will be able to make their own conclusions. Reactions are pseudo-content and they should be used only when content itself can't carr...
(more)
about 4 years ago