20200906, 19:01  #540 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
556_{16} Posts 

20200906, 19:27  #541  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
2A7_{16} Posts 
OK, page updated.
A lot of thanks to all for your help. Quote:
do you want to make reservations for this base ? In the same way, I think to add the bases 50 (=2*5^2), 72 (=2*6^2) and 98 (=2*7^2), up to 50^95, 72^88 and 98^82. It is an effective way to have many sequences that end because for these three bases, as for bases 2 and 18, all sequences end. I take care of base 50 and I will add it only when I will have finished all the sequences up to 50^72. If someone wants to do the preliminary work for bases 72 and 96, let me know here. I believe that with these three additional bases, we will be very well equipped for our statistics in a few months... Quote:
Quote:
I'll change that in the next update. 

20200906, 19:35  #542 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7·97 Posts 
Please, do you manage to reproduce the same error as me, when you enter on factordb the sequence 72^89 from index 0 to 1, like this :
http://factordb.com/sequences.php?se...ange&fr=0&to=1 The answer is totally absurd, at index 0, it indicates 2^534 !!! 
20200906, 21:32  #543  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
4,001 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
72^71 shows 2^426 72^73 shows 2^438 72^79 shows 2^474 72^83 shows 2^498 72^79 shows 2^474 I was going to offer to do the preliminaries for 72. Perhaps I should choose 98. I had not intended to extend base 18 past 2^119 (at least, not for now), so others are free to reserve those. 

20200906, 21:51  #544 
Sep 2008
Kansas
110101110111_{2} Posts 

20200907, 09:06  #545 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3^{2}×383 Posts 

20200907, 16:57  #546  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7×97 Posts 
Quote:
OK, thank you for checking for the malfunction for base 72. Under these conditions, it is better to leave this base aside for the moment ! A few months ago, I had reported other malfunctions on factordb, on sequences of the main project (see here). But the errors were never corrected, nor reported on the blue page. So this is likely to last ! It is indeed better to calculate the base 98 ! OK, seen for base 18. 

20200907, 16:59  #547 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7·97 Posts 

20200907, 17:02  #548 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1010100111_{2} Posts 

20200907, 18:38  #549  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
7641_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I intend to work with base 72 also (to the same size as base 98), with the intention of providing the correct .elfs as attachments for those that are incorrect in the db. That way, we can still do data harvesting via local files. I have posted the list of incorrect ones (checked up through 72^100) here. For the >=140 sequences that are incorrect in the db, I'll supply .elfs which contain at least indices 0 and 1, so that detail of study can be continued. At a later time, I'll revisit the higher exponents for the tables for bases 18, 72, 98. Maybe someone else may be interested in the higher ends of those tables by then. 

20200910, 17:05  #550 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
7·97 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 