Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for zetyty
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #289241 |
The work to find and reproduce the problem was made by @trichoplax ([see this post on chat](https://discord.com/channels/634104110131445811/634104110131445815/1137175661803487302)). (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288974 |
Sorry I was a little in a hurry and I put a comment too quickly on my mobile. Next time I will read more carefully before to "try to help"... Anyway, thanks for this very complete bug report regarding a seemingly quite insidious bug! (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288974 |
Bug not presents in the preview during editing and on mobile. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288769 |
Also I would like to start a bit of discussion regarding if we can set up a kind of "general recommendations" regarding the use of usernames in question/answer pots [as pointed in this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276600/288747#answer-288747). Because if the user change their name or delet... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288769 |
Tanks for this update!
I think this answer will be more used as an "text box" on top of [the linked answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288693/288695#answer-288695) (as it is made for duplicates, "the blue rectangle" or like a quoted text). It would be like an announcement about the fact that th... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
I assume that is it not a good idea to create a lot of new post type because it could be a mess. And I'm pretty sure that this one would not be very used (but me I will definitely use it as soon as there are two solutions to compare!). I think that might help guide opinion-based discussions a bit... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
In order to avoid any misunderstanding, I specify the "recap table" (this name is definitely ugly...) could be used to compare solutions with pro/cons columns and not just summarize them (as shown [in the linked example in the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288693/288694#answer-288694)) or... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
Thank you very much for introducing me to this TOC. I think it's really a good feature! I like your idea to edit the top of answers to change the summary (however the answers are not freely editable, but I think it is still an interesting idea). (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288748 |
Good points thank you. I make an edit after you comment. If you think it is too much opinion based I would be glad to make a second edit ;-). To avoid misunderstanding, for me this new post type could be use, not only for answer review/comparison, but also for listing goods answer related to a topic ... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
Ok great thanks! And what about the Meta site? I would be glad to post some wiki posts here but also post answer and/or question which can be edited by everyone. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
Ok thanks. I come from TeX community on SE and *community wikis* are not very used but quite useful when there are (maybe because TeX users seems to be rigorous people and the post is usually very good.) It is also very used in Meta for discussion or recap or in order to make a post which summarize a... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288695 |
Thank you very much for this answer, I will definitely use this! When you say that you lack time to develop the site, am I to understand that I must refrain from making feature-requests in the future? As I'm not a developer, this is my way of participating to the project but if it bothers the devs I ... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288694 |
I edited the answer after your comments. Thanks a lot! (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
Yes indeed, thanks for this comment! I added an edit to the question. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
We can also imagine a similar status page for bugs. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288694 |
I would be glad if everyone feels free to edit this post in order to improve it and add other solutions and pro/cons, etc.! (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
a rejected feature-request could be "closed for discussion" during a given period of time, for e.g. 1 year, but re-open after (or earlier with moderator intervention after flag raise for e.g.) because the context can change (but this is another question...). (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288692 |
I would be glad if everyone feels free to edit this post in order to improve it and add other solutions and pro/cons, etc.! (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288692 |
I vote for a mix with *Flag* for *Inappropriate comments* (for moderator intervention) and *react* button for all the 5 others (but maybe not *Humoristic* because it could be too opinion based...). And have the possibility to choose predefined comment thread titles, when posting the comment, like: *G... (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
This question was posted 2 years ago so I wonder if your original idea about switching any post as "freely editable" is still on the table? (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #279226 |
An integrated bookmarking feature will (i) be accessible from any devices whatever the browser (even mobile) and (II) the search process will be much more efficient with the possibility of looking for a certain user or tag, etc. (more) |
— | 11 months ago |