Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for zetyty
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #289241 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #289241 |
Post edited: Add blockquote arround figures |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #289260 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
How to edit a post for small modifications without affecting the visibility of other posts? Related: Could we have a way to edit without bumping posts? Motivation I usually edit my own posts a lot of times in order to improve them. This put the corresponding post on top of the "main post page list" (for e.g. meta.codidact.com). However, most of the time I do very little changes... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #289241 |
Post edited: add example with all answers deleted |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #289241 |
The work to find and reproduce the problem was made by @trichoplax ([see this post on chat](https://discord.com/channels/634104110131445811/634104110131445815/1137175661803487302)). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #289241 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
TOC display problem after answer deletion Describe the bug After deleting an answer(s), the table of contents can still be displayed even if there are less answers than the "number of answers to trigger the TOC" and even if there is no answer to the question (in this case the `Table of Contents` button is displayed but clicking it has no ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288974 |
Sorry I was a little in a hurry and I put a comment too quickly on my mobile. Next time I will read more carefully before to "try to help"... Anyway, thanks for this very complete bug report regarding a seemingly quite insidious bug! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288974 |
Bug not presents in the preview during editing and on mobile. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288747 |
Post edited: change the "escape" character by `\@` |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288747 |
Post edited: replace escape caracter in front of @ by § instead of \ |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288703 |
Post edited: Edit about the bug reported |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 |
Post edited: change links to follow-up comment |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288769 |
Also I would like to start a bit of discussion regarding if we can set up a kind of "general recommendations" regarding the use of usernames in question/answer pots [as pointed in this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/276600/288747#answer-288747). Because if the user change their name or delet... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288769 |
Tanks for this update!
I think this answer will be more used as an "text box" on top of [the linked answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288693/288695#answer-288695) (as it is made for duplicates, "the blue rectangle" or like a quoted text). It would be like an announcement about the fact that th... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
I assume that is it not a good idea to create a lot of new post type because it could be a mess. And I'm pretty sure that this one would not be very used (but me I will definitely use it as soon as there are two solutions to compare!). I think that might help guide opinion-based discussions a bit... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
In order to avoid any misunderstanding, I specify the "recap table" (this name is definitely ugly...) could be used to compare solutions with pro/cons columns and not just summarize them (as shown [in the linked example in the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288693/288694#answer-288694)) or... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288762 |
Thank you very much for introducing me to this TOC. I think it's really a good feature! I like your idea to edit the top of answers to change the summary (however the answers are not freely editable, but I think it is still an interesting idea). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288748 |
Good points thank you. I make an edit after you comment. If you think it is too much opinion based I would be glad to make a second edit ;-). To avoid misunderstanding, for me this new post type could be use, not only for answer review/comparison, but also for listing goods answer related to a topic ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288748 |
Post edited: Add Issues sections |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 |
Post edited: adding comment links |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288749 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Link associated with a deleted username, in a comment thread, redirects to the top of the current page. #1089 Describe the bug The name of a deleted user in a comment thread appears with a clickable link. This link redirect to the top of the current page (tested in "main" view and in comment thread view) To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: 1. Go to https://meta.codidact.com/posts/282342/2... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288747 |
Post edited: added exemple of warning when an image with no alt text is given |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288748 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
New post type: a recap table Motivation I often want to use a table to: - Compare different solutions (for example, solutions addressing a new feature-request). - List related posts and duplicates (some topics can be extremely diluted in dozens of posts in a community or even spread over several communities. In this case it... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288747 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Can I use @Username to notify users from within my question or answer? If this feature (i.e. notifying user in Q&A body content by "@Username") is NOT implemented, then (IMHO) it should not be allowed at all to write @Username because: - If the user pointed to by @Username changes their username or deletes their account, then the @Username will not be relevant (becau... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288692 |
Post edited: remove author name in link + litle change in table text (cons #3) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 |
Post edited: removed author name in answer link |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
Ok great thanks! And what about the Meta site? I would be glad to post some wiki posts here but also post answer and/or question which can be edited by everyone. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #280058 |
Ok thanks. I come from TeX community on SE and *community wikis* are not very used but quite useful when there are (maybe because TeX users seems to be rigorous people and the post is usually very good.) It is also very used in Meta for discussion or recap or in order to make a post which summarize a... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288692 |
Post edited: Typo |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 |
Post edited: Typo + reformulation of th 1rst cons of solution #2 regarding visibility status |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288703 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
How to keep displayed usernames unique even if the user account is deleted? Motivation On Stack Exchange (SE) I could have a really hard time following a discussion in comments between multiple users if one of the users deleted their account or changed their username. Here on Codidact, this "problem" seems to be handled much better as the username seems to change when ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288695 |
Thank you very much for this answer, I will definitely use this! When you say that you lack time to develop the site, am I to understand that I must refrain from making feature-requests in the future? As I'm not a developer, this is my way of participating to the project but if it bothers the devs I ... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288694 |
I edited the answer after your comments. Thanks a lot! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288693 |
Post edited: EDIT about voting on status page |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 |
Post edited: EDIT to say that this solution is irrelevant after follow-up answer + adding cons for tags |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
Yes indeed, thanks for this comment! I added an edit to the question. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
We can also imagine a similar status page for bugs. (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288694 |
I would be glad if everyone feels free to edit this post in order to improve it and add other solutions and pro/cons, etc.! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288694 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: A feature-request status page EDIT after follow-up comments thread (where links for tags tab and status are given) and answer: The solution proposed here already exists so it is irrelevant. The pro/cons part could still be used to compare the current solution and the solution with a "status page" (#1 in the table below)... Sim... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288693 |
a rejected feature-request could be "closed for discussion" during a given period of time, for e.g. 1 year, but re-open after (or earlier with moderator intervention after flag raise for e.g.) because the context can change (but this is another question...). (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #288693 | Initial revision | — | over 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
A feature-request status page Motivation I have the feeling (obviously biased ;) that some feature requests get forgotten over time. I absolutely do not claim that it is anyone's fault but that they naturally become less visible over time because they are less active (it's a guess). Based on this assumption, the question is... (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #288692 |
I would be glad if everyone feels free to edit this post in order to improve it and add other solutions and pro/cons, etc.! (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |