Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for mr Tsjolder
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #290079 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
Question | — |
Can the homepage become more like the dashboard? I have been visiting the site for some time now and I am slowly developing a bit of a problem with the landing page for codidact.com: - First of all, there is no indication on that page of whether I am logged in or not. As a result, I don't have access to notifications and I always have to navi... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289322 |
@#64277 I am afraid I am too little of a legal person to judge that. The main point that I wanted to bring across is that it probably will not suffice to only provide the licenses on request as suggested by @#53890. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289322 |
@#53890 I am afraid that these licences are typically stricter than copyright law. E.g. from the [CC-by-SA license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode) (4a):
> [...] You must include a copy of, or the Uniform Resource Identifier for, this License with every copy or phonorecor... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289322 |
Does access through an API comply with all possible licenses for questions and answers? If yes, shouldn't the licenses be included when this content is programmatically accessed, so that end-users know what they are allowed (not) to do with the retrieved content? (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
Comment | Post #289202 |
There is also discord as the temporary chat solution. Would it be reasonable to expect moderators to be reachable via the discord channel? (more) |
— | over 1 year ago |