Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Activity for Michael‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #292856 > It also sounds like Codidact could simply switch to using Matrix directly rather than building its own chat that interfaces with Matrix. Since it's an open standard this might be worth looking into. There are [multiple server implementations](https://matrix.org/ecosystem/servers/) out there, and...
(more)
30 days ago
Comment Post #292856 Matrix is a chatroom/comms protocol (somewhat like IRC or XMPP). I appreciate their primary focus on the spec, but I'm also using it right now to interface with the Codidact Discord. I can't do all the things in Discord from it, but I can also run most of my other communications out of there, like I ...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #292856 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Answer A: Poll for chat users and non-chat users
I use chat. All things being equal, I would prefer it not to be run by Discord. I'm not going to leave because of that preference,[^1] but a community managed instance of a chat platform[^2] would be more attractive to me than a Discord, Slack, etc.
(more)
about 1 month ago
Edit Post #292855 Initial revision about 1 month ago
Question Code of Conduct has a variable in its text
The Code of Conduct text on all the sites [communities] has some default text that is either supposed to be replaced by string templating or maybe customized. Emphasis in quote block below. > This Code of Conduct applies to all online spaces run by the $EDIT-org-name organization, as well as offic...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #292808 Agreed with Olin. Maybe one could combine timeframe with last N events. Something like "Last `M` years' positive events, filling backward to `X` positive events if you don't have `X` events in the last `M` years" and then supplement with "Any negative events from last `N` years' _total_ events, ba...
(more)
about 1 month ago
Comment Post #292656 You could have a link to a search page with the filters pre-filled.
(more)
about 2 months ago
Comment Post #292300 That's neat! Very clever getting a good sense of how successful a flagger has been. I would change the wording, then. Percent might *technically* be correct,[^1] being a per-100 of the Wilson Score calculation... but it's not used in the way most people have typically encountered it. [^1]: "Th...
(more)
3 months ago
Comment Post #292126 Great question. I mean ones where I'd want a different sort order. The only thing I've come up with so far is multi-word names, and it might be a stretch: - Search term: `tri` - Want to find: The Great **Tri**choplax - Ranked ahead: S**tri**ngify
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #292165 Initial revision 4 months ago
Question Abilities progress meter ahead of expected progress
I'm confused about the numbers in a progress-tracker for abilities. On Writing, there's a lot of spam. I've flagged a lot of spam. I have (for those who can see) 30 helpful flags. On a whim, I went to the Vote on Holds ability page to see how close I would be to it.[^posts] Here's what's weird. Th...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #292126 Interesting thought! I like the algorithm, but I want to have a think on counterexamples.
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #292126 Initial revision 4 months ago
Answer A: User search only finds names which begin with the search term
[celtschk][] says in a comment that we could show all relevant results and help the searcher by sorting those results in a useful order: > Another [way] to handle it would be to order the results by how well the search term matches. The exact match, if it exists, should certainly be the top result...
(more)
4 months ago
Edit Post #291184 Post edited:
Consolidate "new-users" tag just used here with "new-user"
4 months ago
Edit Post #290068 Post edited:
Add some tags
4 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #291184 Suggested edit:
Consolidate "new-users" tag just used here with "new-user"
(more)
helpful 4 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #290068 Suggested edit:
Add some tags
(more)
helpful 4 months ago
Comment Post #291717 @celtschk If you transfer that comment to an answer, I'd upvote it. If you don't, I'll make an answer citing you. I ran into this same user search thing today.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #292057 I've knocked down the level of the headings on a few of my posts where h1 was used. I'm not enthusiastic about h5 being smaller (14px) than normal text (16px).
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #292057 If top-level headings are discouraged, you may want to make that clear. Perhaps a warning somewhere when one would be rendered into the output? My semantic content exposure is kind of old, now, but I was under the impression that heading levels reset inside `<article>` blocks. I don't know if ans...
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #292005 Matrix can also puppet back to Discord in case existing chatters want to stick with that. I don't have a big urgent push for any particular system, but I do know the backwards-compatibility will work there and might be nice.
(more)
4 months ago
Comment Post #291717 Looks good. Thanks.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #291717 In the glorious future when CD has 10k+ active users, it might be a hindrance for search results to return all people whose names have a matching substring. That could be lots of extra results to wade through.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #291717 From the title (and the "prefixes"), I was concerned that searching `trichoplax` would not find you, but it does.
(more)
5 months ago
Comment Post #291579 On the question list page, there is often a "Last modified by XYZ" on questions where I flagged a bad post. If I click through, that person's name is not on the modification for any of the visible posts. I can infer that there is a removed post, handled by that person, and correlate to my flags. (Obv...
(more)
6 months ago
Edit Post #278008 Post edited:
causal -> casual. Some other proofreading help.
7 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #278008 Suggested edit:
causal -> casual. Some other proofreading help.
(more)
helpful 7 months ago
Comment Post #291285 Good question. Maybe I've just never found a decent client. I had some CLI thing I don't remember, then Firefox's IRC client (remember that?), and then WeeChat for when I need to.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #291285 > &hellip;without understanding why they made the decision in the first place. [Chesterton's Fence](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chesterton%27s_fence). Very good!
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #291285 Is this a "why" question, or is this a "Let's change it" attempt? You seem to be asking both things, which is awkward: Someone who can answer the "why" probably isn't excited about moving, and someone who would like to move or IRC or Matrix probably doesn't know why Discord was chosen.
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #291285 > - The UX of Discord is poor I assert this is also true for IRC. Matrix is nice if you can find an appropriate homeserver. I agree with your other points, although I have joined the Discord.
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #291243 Post edited:
It's not no-result searches.
8 months ago
Comment Post #291243 Aha! You're right! I had just tried `q` (results) and `z` (none), but I didn't examine any further. There's a `serialization` tag, so I can't be right.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #291243 Post edited:
Wild speculation. Monica also found a 2-char
8 months ago
Edit Post #291243 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Searching tags with a string with more than two characters results in a 500
I suspect it's a 500 if the search is not found in any tags. I can reproduce with a single-char search of `z` on Software. This is wild speculation, but maybe there's some item access that can't deal with a null or empty array of results. Thanks to Monica and Trichoplax's 2-char demos for putting ...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #291185 I misunderstood you, then. Carry on.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #291185 Codidact gets a bunch of answers, especially in "Writing," that follow this pattern (annotated with footnotes): > You can make citations by [answer-y stuff written by GPT] as found in **hxxp://example.com/how-to-[^normal]suika game[^spam]-cite-sources[^normal]**. [GPT answer continues] [^norma...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #291177 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Introduce a spam reaction?
I'm stealing an idea from trichoplax in the comments: Disable links on posts flagged as spam. There's some potential for abuse here, too,[^abuse] but I suspect it is somewhat unlikely. We can also add an ability based on, say, "5 approved flags and flag-approve-rate > 75%" that enables the automat...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #291173 Just don't HTML-encode the spaces and any number will collapse into one! :-P
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #291153 Post edited:
Make the list into a table. A couple grammar things.
8 months ago
Suggested Edit Post #291153 Suggested edit:
Make the list into a table. A couple grammar things.
(more)
helpful 8 months ago
Comment Post #291130 This should be an answer.
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #291108 Initial revision 8 months ago
Answer A: Allow completely pseudonymous user accounts
I'm not opposed in principle, but I don't think the amount of work is likely worthwhile. I imagine this sets you up for weird bugs far into the future. > - One person can have any number of email addresses. For someone who knows how, it's fairly trivial to set up a throwaway email account which ca...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #291030 I found the parent tag indicator after Moshi's answer. But it's still good to have the screenshot prominently in an answer. +1
(more)
9 months ago
Comment Post #290916 This would be helpful for ~~us proles~~ _[non-moderators]_ to investigate spammers.
(more)
9 months ago