Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Michaelâ€
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #291285 |
Good question. Maybe I've just never found a decent client. I had some CLI thing I don't remember, then Firefox's IRC client (remember that?), and then WeeChat for when I need to. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #291285 |
> …without understanding why they made the decision in the first place.
[Chesterton's Fence](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chesterton%27s_fence). Very good! (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #291285 |
Is this a "why" question, or is this a "Let's change it" attempt? You seem to be asking both things, which is awkward: Someone who can answer the "why" probably isn't excited about moving, and someone who would like to move or IRC or Matrix probably doesn't know why Discord was chosen. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #291285 |
> - The UX of Discord is poor
I assert this is also true for IRC. Matrix is nice if you can find an appropriate homeserver. I agree with your other points, although I have joined the Discord. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #291243 |
Aha! You're right! I had just tried `q` (results) and `z` (none), but I didn't examine any further. There's a `serialization` tag, so I can't be right. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291185 |
I misunderstood you, then. Carry on. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291185 |
Codidact gets a bunch of answers, especially in "Writing," that follow this pattern (annotated with footnotes):
> You can make citations by [answer-y stuff written by GPT] as found in **hxxp://example.com/how-to-[^normal]suika game[^spam]-cite-sources[^normal]**. [GPT answer continues]
[^norma... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291173 |
Just don't HTML-encode the spaces and any number will collapse into one! :-P (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291130 |
This should be an answer. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291030 |
I found the parent tag indicator after Moshi's answer. But it's still good to have the screenshot prominently in an answer. +1 (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290916 |
This would be helpful for ~~us proles~~ _[non-moderators]_ to investigate spammers. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290983 |
> Would it be better or worse if we filled it with something like "answer to (Title)"?
I think I'd prefer the "answer to `$title`" version. Easier to delete than to click back and forth another time. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #291001 |
Maybe you should try the short "X" column at the end of one of your sandbox tests, with a long (wrappable) column as a middle column. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290996 |
Okay. I have a basic demo table and screenshots both ways. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290756 |
I like the idea, but Mithical's point is important. Even the millions of dollars in the SE network haven't resulted in a `.se` for each of their communities. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #278294 |
If I were doing it, I'd patch the code to be `#{post id}-fn{id}` and `#{post id}-fnref{id}`. Easier to read than GUIDs and you probably have all the data already at your fingertips. With editable posts, I don't think GUIDs would necessarily even stay consistent. Whether you seed the GUID from the ord... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290623 |
Four questions and they were _all_ deleted? That makes me a little nervous about my new question. For all I know, I asked the same thing as one of them. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #288931 |
\>0 after `trim()`, maybe, to get rid of spacebar-only stuff?
There's also an argument to be made for >0 after stripping `[^[:alnum:]]` to prevent posts of `.`, but this might get weird if someone tries a _real_ post of entirely symbols and punctuation that is too clever by half. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #282698 |
For what it's worth, I think the full-column left/right background should just be white. You already know it's a before/after view, no? Then narrow the subsequent styles one step each:
- Whole paragraph with changes: **pale** green/red.
- Modified characters: **medium** green/red (plus the underl... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290419 |
How about X% and hover-text the actual minimum/maximum? Everybody understands percent. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290389 |
Glad you're sticking around. I was a bit worried that my disagreements with your vote display scheme had soured you on the site. But I'm happy you're here. I even [quoted your blog](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/290068/290085#answer-290085) before you started posting. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290326 |
_"To put it another way, the tricky problem is showing the difference between +0/-0 and +X/-X."_ Agreed. It's a problem that SO chose to obscure behind the 1000-rep click-to-see-raw-votes.
_"I'm not sure you necessarily need to use the same solution to both problems."_ That could be, but I'm going... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #290326 |
If there's a question that has only attracted poor answers, and the top one is +0-2 (or +1-6 or whatever), "Wow! Rank #1" is kind of misleading. If you mean "rank" meaning "cohort" like Isaac's pentiles, I'm interested. But if you mean `RANK() OVER (ORDER BY upvotes - downvotes)`, I don't want that. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #290234 |
Aha! That had not occurred to me. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
Comment | Post #275863 |
Can you add code block syntax, possibly with prettyprint instructions? (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #290086 |
Turns out I can close as dup myself. Done. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #290086 |
Oh, great! I didn't find it in my search of "Tooltip." Feel free to close as duplicate! (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #290056 |
For GitHub links, do you specifically mean links to the `codidact` organization's resources, or any GH link? I'm imaging the former, but your comment could be interpreted either way. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #290048 |
Awesome. Thanks for your patience with a newcomer! I like the Wilson score measure; I just didn't realize it was used for more than sorting. (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #290052 |
_"This isn't possible, as of yet. It's a limitation in the system, and one that needs fixing."_ If you post this as an answer, I will upvote it and look forward to flagging it as "Outdated." (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
Comment | Post #288102 |
It might be helpful to link out to the [Score help page](https://meta.codidact.com/help/scoring) in the score labels to [help people understand](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/290048) that it's the Wilson Score, not the net votes. Maybe also helpful for old hands to see the nicely colored chart of s... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |