Since the user account is deleted, I can't expect a reasonable response, but I wonder what was meant by (and more importantly, how the 29 upvoting people and non-downvoters are interpreting) "rather than a tool a Silicon Valley ideological agenda". It's obviously a shorthand, but the meaning is not obvious to me at all. It could mean anything from "this community is near-unanimous in holding an opinion I find reprehensible", to "this community is near-unanimous in an opinion I don't have strong feelings about", or "this community is near-unanimous in an opinion I agree with". The alarm-raising phrase "ideological agenda" rather than something more like "culture" or "opinions" or "practices" or "behavior" makes me guess that I would not fit in with this community. I wish this post were more clear.

Mark S.‭ Apparently this (now deleted) user doesn't like something that he perceives to be the culture of "Silicon Valley". He is expressing satisfaction that the Code of Conduct does NOT try to push whatever he thinks a "Silicon Valley ideological agenda" is. That means he thinks said agenda is bad.

In any case, you shouldn't read much into this. There are many reasons people might have upvoted this answer. The likely main reason is that it's mostly factual and correct. I don't know what the Silicon Valley reference is supposed to mean either, but in the end this answer is saying that the Code of Conduct is reasonable. Upvoters may have shrugged at the SV reference and upvoted for the rest. In any case, the Code of Conduct is available for you to read so that you can make up your own mind about it.

This one post should really not be much of a reason to decide whether to be active in Codidact or not. Look around at what we actually DO, and make up your own mind.

Mark S.‭ Also note that the question currently has four answers, and this answer has the least positive vote of all of them. The vote tally seems high for Codidact, until you compare it to the other answers. Put another way, it only seems high due to high overall volume, but not in a relative sense. Perhaps that is because of the ambiguity of the last point. Too many people may not want to say "I agree" when it's not clear what they are agreeing to, or it sounds like a rant, or ... whatever.